[Rhodes22-list] Jesusland.

[Steve]

Stan
Gays don't need to be married.  They can get power of
atorney over one another. But marriage is between a
man & a women.  Beside, check your Bible.  Remember
what happen to that one city?  People are free to sin
and break the law but on the whole; it's not right or
moral.  

I thought the Dems was the party for the people.  I
guess that has changed.  Looks like the Dems now
respresent the gays, eviromental wackos - whats funny
is they even lost a bunch of the union vote:-)Times
are a changing!
Steve


--- stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:

> I get it.  You like your definition of marriage so
> much the same couples 
> keep doing it over and over again - but with
> different partners - I guess 
> the term marriage makes it all legal, moral and
> family value.
> 
> Now you tell me.  I have been missing all that fun.
> 
> stan/EC
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve" <rhodes2282 at yahoo.com>
> To: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>; "The Rhodes 22 mail
> list" 
> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Jesusland.
> 
> 
> > Marrage record, Stan.  Lets see, the liberal want
> to
> > let gays get married.  That not a marrage.  And
> you
> > can't redefined marrage to suit your own needs.
> > Marrage is between a Man & a Women.  What's next
> for
> > the liberals - marrage between a Man or Women and
> an
> > animal ?????????  Surely the liberals don't want
> to
> > descrimiate against some Man & his dog:-)
> >
> > Thank God we don't allow that in the south!!!!!!!!
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > --- stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> >
> >> give that man a free Rhodes
> >>
> >> Actually the records show that the bleeding heart
> >> liberals have a marriage
> >> record far superior to the conservative bible
> belt
> >> crowd.   We have been
> >> married well over 50 years - she to two men and
> me
> >> to three ladies.  Just
> >> kidding, only to each other - something I have
> found
> >> extremely rare in the
> >> religious right part of the country where the
> rule
> >> for that family value is
> >> more like musical chairs.
> >>
> >> stan/EC
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Stephen Staum" <staum at earthlink.net>
> >> To: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>; "The Rhodes 22
> mail
> >> list"
> >> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 6:55 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Jesusland.
> >>
> >>
> >> >I have to weigh in with Robert on this one.  I
> >> cannot stand all the "family
> >> > values" crap dispursed by the Republicans.  It
> is
> >> as if Democrats,
> >> > Independants and (God forbid we mention)
> Liberals
> >> did not care about their
> >> > families.
> >> >
> >> > Religion (including prayer in school) has no
> place
> >> in government.  SS
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> >> > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> >> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:53 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Jesusland.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I have to disagree on your definition of
> morals
> >> and ethics.  In most,
> >> >> if not all, dictionaries, morals and ethics
> are
> >> synonymous terms and
> >> >> are often used to define one another.  Nether
> one
> >> implies a Deity.
> >> >> They both are based upon acting out of a sense
> of
> >> right or wrong, good
> >> >> or evil.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hank
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:13:36 -0500, Robert
> >> Skinner
> >> >> <robert at squirrelhaven.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Rummy -
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Couldn't agree more about the problems that
> >> come
> >> >> > up when we combine religion with politics.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Part of the background of our current
> "family
> >> values"
> >> >> > vs. secular considerations may come from our
> >> failure
> >> >> > to distinguish between moral issues and
> ethical
> >> ones.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Morals are a product of a person's dialogue
> >> with his
> >> >> > deity of choice - and there is more than one
> >> such
> >> >> > acknowledged in this country.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ethics are shared in a society without
> regard
> >> to
> >> >> > religion - or the society falls apart.  When
> >> the
> >> >> > society decides to enforce morals, it
> becomes a
> >> >> > theocracy, and people's rights are submerged
> in
> >> the
> >> >> > regulations laid down by the priest class,
> >> specially
> >> >> > when it is indistinguishable from the ruling
> >> class.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I believe that the "family values" issues
> >> raised in
> >> >> > the last election are totally irrelevant to
> our
> >> >> > government, and were used in the most
> >> unscrupulous
> >> >> > way to obscure the real issues confronting
> our
> >> >> > government.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > /Robert Skinner
> >> >> >
> -----------------------------------------------
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > R22RumRunner at aol.com wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > In a message dated 11/21/2004 2:06:47 PM
> >> Eastern Standard Time,
> >> >> > > flybrad at yahoo.com writes:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
http://realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/2004_County_Results_Final.html
> >> >> > > I get it now, those people that didn't
> vote
> >> for Bush, according to
> >> >> > > the
> >> > red
> >> >> > > and blue map, are less religious than
> those
> >> that did.
> >> >> > > This country is in a sad state of affairs.
> >> What happens to the people
> >> > that
> >> >> > > are either in the red or blue, voted for
> >> their candidate, but aren't
> >> > religious?
> >> >> > >  Where do we fit in? Personally, I don't
> >> think religion has any place
> >> > in
> >> >> > > politics. Something about the separation
> of
> >> church and state. Our
> >> > founding
> >> >> > > father's were very smart in writing this
> into
> >> our constitution.
> >> > Putting the two
> >> >> > > together only muddies the waters even more
> >> than they already are.
> >> > Religion or
> >> >> > > actions taken in the name of religion have
> >> done more harm to the
> >> > planet than
> >> >> > > any  other "just" cause. Let the priests,
> >> rabbi's, mullah's(sp) and
> >> > ministers
> >> >> > > tend their flocks, but leave the rest of
> us
> >> alone.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Rummy
> >> >> >
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> >> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> __________________________________________________
> >> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
> > http://my.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com