[Rhodes22-list] Political/warin Iraq.

[Herb Parsons]

Hmmm, I thought that "evidence" was debunked.

All records indicate that George W Bush fulfilled his military
requirements.

>>> bill at effros.com 9/29/2004 8:23:16 PM >>>
Herb,

Sorry I haven't been following this thread.  Did I miss the part where
someone explained why it was OK for W. to fail to show up during the
Vietnam war, and why that didn't make him a shirker and coward?

Bill Effros
                                     


To download a free copy of the electronic book "Quote Without Comment"

Click on or copy this address and load it into your web browser:
http://www.quotewithoutcomment.com/qwc.cgim?template=FreeBook 

Want to see more quotes?
http://www.QuoteWithoutComment.com 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Herb Parsons 
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org 
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Political/warin Iraq.


I suggest it's a symptom of many things. A society that feels less and
less true responsibilty to live up to it's obligation. That would
account for the "I don't WANT to do what I said" part. A society that
has been very long living in relative peace. That would explain the
"But
I didn't think I'd have to FIGHT when I joined the military".

That fact is, there were plenty of AWOLs and deserters during WWII as
well. As a matter of fact, if memory serves me correctly, WWII was the
last war where we court-martialed and executed a deserter.

In any war, we'll have a number of shirkers and cowards.

>>> robert at squirrelhaven.com 9/29/2004 7:40:26 PM >>>
Herb Parsons wrote:
> 
> So, you're advocating the idea that reservists should be free to go
AWOL
> or even desert if they don't agree with their commanders? I REALLY
try
> to stay out of the political discussions on here, but that one I
would
> take a BIG issue with.

Whoa, Herb - WAY not what I said!  Check it out.

I suggested that the AWOL figure (if accurate) is a
symptom of our country's polarization.  Like Viet
Nam...

/Bob Skinner

-----------------------------------------
What I said:

> Perhaps the message is not that desertion/AWOL is OK,
> but rather the fact that so many reservists (if the
> number is correct) are willing to risk so much in
> defiance of orders.
> 
> A reserve army structure is naturally more influenced
> by civilian issues than the regular forces.  IMHO, it
> is very possible to overstress a reserve/volunteer
> military structure with a divisive or unpopular war.
> 
> Perhaps that is what is going on...
> 
> /Bob Skinner
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list