[Rhodes22-list] Reply on Art and Rummy erroneous reading

[Hank]

Now, if I can just get my wife to believe that it is not my fault that I
didn't understand what she said.....

Hank

On 11/8/06, Joseph Hadzima <josef508 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hank
>
> I agree with you on this topic
>
> I was also taught that the sender has 100% responsibility
> to ensure the message is clearly understood.  Now part of
> that effort was to use a technique called "reflective
> listening".  Since Ed has added clarification I assume we
> can't fault him on this transmission :-)
>
> joe/hadz.
>
>
> --- Hank <hnw555 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > In the communications classes I have attended, it has
> > always bees stressed
> > to me that misinterpretations are the fault of the
> > sender, not the
> > receiver.  If you do not want your message misunderstood,
> > then you need to
> > craft it in such a way that leaves no room for
> > misunderstanding, not
> > criticize the receiver for interpreting an ambiguous
> > message in a way you
> > did not intend.
> >
> > Elle, you are the literary and grammatical; pundit on
> > this list.  What do
> > you think?
> >
> > Hank
> >
> > On 11/8/06, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Art,
> > >      The you in the offending paragraph was meant to be
> > plural and generic
> > > to those who criticized his posts.  It was not intended
> > for you
> > > specifically.  However, I guess it is appropriate to
> > put you into the
> > > group,
> > > as you seem to desire to be there.
> > >       Remember when reading my post that all that I say
> > does not come out
> > > in
> > > print.  Some English language words are the same
> > spelling in singular and
> > > plural thus offering the unique opportunity to
> > misinterpret.
> > >
> > > Ed K
> > > Greenville, SC, USA
> > > Addendum:
> > > "No more expensive way of going really slowly has been
> > invented by man
> > > than
> > > sailing."  Gary Mull
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Arthur H. Czerwonky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rummy,
> > > >
> > > > What a twist of facts by Ed.  He needs to research
> > the archives, change
> > > > the subject line, and learn not to suggest the absurd
> > - a growing habit
> > > of
> > > > his.  I had very pleasant emails with Roger a few
> > months ago and found
> > > him
> > > > very knowledgeable, helpful, and congenial.
> > Certainly a techie, but not
> > > > with a know-it-all personna.  I'll look forward to
> > meeting him in the
> > > > future.  He would probably be a good re-addition to
> > the list.
> > > >
> > > > So, Ed, get it together!
> > > >
> > > > Art
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > > >>Sent: Nov 7, 2006 1:21 PM
> > > >>To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > > >>Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Reply on Motor Mount
> > part 2
> > > >>
> > > >>Ed,
> > > >>I don't believe Art is responsible for Roger being
> > "run off the list". I
> > > had
> > > >>more of a hand in that than anyone.
> > > >>
> > > >>Rummy
> > > >>__________________________________________________
> > > >>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Reply-on-Motor-Mount-part-2-tf2590124.html#a7246099
> > > Sent from the Rhodes22 mailing list archive at
> > Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>