[Rhodes22-list] Reply on Art and Rummy erroneous reading

[Joseph Hadzima]

NO ... if we are concerned with the correct meaning of
sentence then I believe a "School-Marm" would be the proper
choice as a judge. :-)  I think the Lawyers have their own
language, and predefined set of phrases just to keep us
common folk out of the club. :-)

joe/hadz.



--- "Michael D. Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com> wrote:

> Hank,
> 
> I absolutely love your construction "If you do not want
> your message
> misunderstood..."  Essentially you employ a double
> negative to make your
> point.  I had to read it twice to be certain of the
> meaning.  I was taught
> to avoid such constructions since most readers actually
> read by phrase not
> by specific words, sometimes causing a misunderstanding.
> 
> As far as the responsibility of the writer to avoid a
> misunderstanding, I
> agree wholeheartedly, although there are many reasons for
> misunderstandings
> in communications, not the least of all is the ambiguous
> nature of the
> language.  If it was truly possible to write a
> communication that could only
> be interpreted in a single manner, we would not require
> lawyers.
> 
> Mike
> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> 
> 
> From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:31 PM
> 
> 
> > Ed,
> >
> > In the communications classes I have attended, it has
> always bees stressed
> > to me that misinterpretations are the fault of the
> sender, not the
> > receiver.  If you do not want your message
> misunderstood, then you need to
> > craft it in such a way that leaves no room for
> misunderstanding, not
> > criticize the receiver for interpreting an ambiguous
> message in a way you
> > did not intend.
> >
> > Elle, you are the literary and grammatical; pundit on
> this list.  What do
> > you think?
> >
> > Hank
> >
> > On 11/8/06, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Art,
> > >      The you in the offending paragraph was meant to
> be plural and
> generic
> > > to those who criticized his posts.  It was not
> intended for you
> > > specifically.  However, I guess it is appropriate to
> put you into the
> > > group,
> > > as you seem to desire to be there.
> > >       Remember when reading my post that all that I
> say does not come
> out
> > > in
> > > print.  Some English language words are the same
> spelling in singular
> and
> > > plural thus offering the unique opportunity to
> misinterpret.
> > >
> > > Ed K
> > > Greenville, SC, USA
> > > Addendum:
> > > "No more expensive way of going really slowly has
> been invented by man
> > > than
> > > sailing."  Gary Mull
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Arthur H. Czerwonky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rummy,
> > > >
> > > > What a twist of facts by Ed.  He needs to research
> the archives,
> change
> > > > the subject line, and learn not to suggest the
> absurd - a growing
> habit
> > > of
> > > > his.  I had very pleasant emails with Roger a few
> months ago and found
> > > him
> > > > very knowledgeable, helpful, and congenial. 
> Certainly a techie, but
> not
> > > > with a know-it-all personna.  I'll look forward to
> meeting him in the
> > > > future.  He would probably be a good re-addition to
> the list.
> > > >
> > > > So, Ed, get it together!
> > > >
> > > > Art
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > > >>Sent: Nov 7, 2006 1:21 PM
> > > >>To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > > >>Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Reply on Motor Mount
> part 2
> > > >>
> > > >>Ed,
> > > >>I don't believe Art is responsible for Roger being
> "run off the list".
> I
> > > had
> > > >>more of a hand in that than anyone.
> > > >>
> > > >>Rummy
> > > >>__________________________________________________
> > > >>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Reply-on-Motor-Mount-part-2-tf2590124.html#a7246099
> > > Sent from the Rhodes22 mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
>