[Rhodes22-list] Failure to state (speak) truth (Political Response to egregious misstatements)

[Brad Haslett]

Ed,

1.2 Trillion dollars.  1.2 Trillion!  That's how much value the market
lost yesterday. It could have easily been up by half that amount or
more.  One person, a so called House leader, couldn't even get her own
committee chairman behind her, then she runs her foot wide pie-hole
for five minutes and look at the results.  1.2 Trillion in one day.

Follow the money.  Who do the people on Wall Street primarily donate
money to?  Read the constitution. Who is responsible for making laws?
Why does Wall Street overwhelmingly support one party over another?

1.2 Trillion

Brad

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
>
> It was posted on this forum, "The people are not willing to allow the nouveau
> rich CEOs to keep their multimillion bail-out packages - the packages
> designed to insulate them from the consequences of their decisions."
>
> It was implied that conservative Americans caused the above.  Analyze the
> perpetrators of the alleged acts.   There were two principle categories.
>
> There were those employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Were those
> culprits conservatives or even employed by conservative thinking boards?
> No, look at Raines and Johnson.  Raines was the favorite of the California
> Marxist and National Democrat, Maxine Waters.  Johnson was a fellow traveler
> of Barack Obama and even was on his Vice Presidential search committee!
> What happens to their organizations under their watch?  The poster continues
> to espouse lies.
>
> The second category is the business executives being employed by major
> corporations.  These executives are employed by a board of directors.  Often
> they are chairman of the board, i.e., the boss.  The board members are often
> anointed by them.  That is insider abuse of position.  I am sure that many
> lawsuits will follow.  Breach of fiduciary duty by those culprits will by
> exposed.  Maybe appropriate legislation will be enacted demanding separation
> of those positions in publically held companies.
>
> Those ethical abuses are not caused by conservatives.  They apparently are
> tolerated by National Democrats and Rockefeller Republicans [aka NeoMarxist]
> under all kinds of slick talk and dubious reasoning.  But how often does
> that reasoning ask for good moral judgement?
>
> Socialism and Marxism are not a good answer.  Just look at the Marxist
> influence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Insiders appointed and anointed by
> Marxist screwed Americans as fast as they could.
>
> The failure was lack or no oversight.  Conservatives do not oppose having a
> Sheriff.  The Sheriff must not be controlled by fox nor must he enforce the
> foxes agenda.  The poster of these remarks fails to properly analyze the
> situation and spouts lies and misstatements as facts.  He sounds like Maxine
> Waters and other Marxists.
>
> Failure of ethical conduct is thus well demonstrated under socialist
> programs.  It will not be fixed by more socialist programs causing more
> opportunity for more misconduct.
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19739721.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>