[Rhodes22-list] Was Sails Now Boom Vangs

KUHN, LELAND LKUHN at cnmc.org
Tue Jan 12 15:15:27 EST 2010


David,

I'd be interested in seeing a picture.  $150 is pretty cheap for boat
money.

Can it be used on a reach?  I also see it more useful downwind but once
the end of the boom is outside the end of the traveler it's tough to
pull the boom down.

If nothing else, I'd like to sail my boat backwards.

Thanks!

Lee



-----Original Message-----
From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
[mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of David Culp
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:00 PM
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Was Sails Now Boom Vangs

Since you guys brought this up and not me.... I will tell you that there
is
a way to have a "boom vang/preventer" type apparatus on the Rhodes 22
that
works with the pop top up or down and the boom up or down.  I have been
reluctant to mention it on this forum because it is an experimental,
personal project.  However, like Mark McQuire I have decided to "come
clean"
with my Rhodes buds and budettes.   I built it this last summer for
about $
150.00 dollars and have been testing it since then with good results.
It is
not a true boom vang, but it does accomplish the three main things that
I
wanted:

1.  Keep the boom down and parallel to the deck running downwind with a
possible performance gain.

2.  Prevent an accidental gybe.

3.  Not interfere with the pop top or ingress/egress from the cabin and
works in either boom position.

An unintended result of having it installed is my new ability to sail
the
boat backwards.  I did this initially to test
the structural integrity of the setup.  Then it became a joke.  You get
some
very interesting reactions from power boaters as you go by them sailing
your
Rhodes backwards.  Perhaps even a few have given up drinking as a result
.... nah!  Anyway, I was going to video it and put it up on YouTube.
Still
coming, but my videographer who also participated in some of the testing
is
very sick right now and I wanted to give him a shot a being a part of
it.

Issues:

True boom vangs can be tightened and swing the full 180 degree travel of
the
boom.  My system has two attach points and the tensioning line must be
released to run in the blocks in either a tack or gybe and then you have
to
move the snap shackle to the other side and re-tension.  However, it
does a
great job of controlling boom rise working downwind and really the
Rhodes
doesn't need a boom vang except downwind in my opinion.  In other words,
with a small, end-sheeted main, you really can't depower with a vang
close
to the wind for a noticeable result.  The traveler is much more
effective in
that regard.

Accidental gybes have been tested up to wind speeds of approximately
12-13
kts with good results but I wouldn't go much higher then that.  My
target is
15 kts., but so far haven't gotten to test in a known steady 15 kt wind.
 The perfect system and there are some on the market, would allow a slow
release of the boom to gybe the boat.  Otherwise, there are some huge
transitional loads put on the rig, tensioning lines and hardware of this
system or any system for that matter.  Accidental gybes in a sailboat
are
dangerous and never good for the rig regardless of what system is in
place.
 This preventer will prevent an accidental gybe, but even better, it
gives
you more time to recognize that possibility and recover your course
before
it happens.

Should the normal Rhodes owner run out and put this on his/her boat?
 Leaving it up to you, but most probably don't care.  Would the
manufacturer
of the boat recommend it? Probably not as presently designed.  Has it
worked
well for me and been convincing to other sailors who have witnessed its
operation?  Yes!   Could you hurt yourself or damage your boat with it?
Maybe, if you are not paying attention and do stupid things in high
winds.
 Of course, that holds true in any sailing situation; so it is not
inherently dangerous.

Now the most important thing:  Did it increase the speed of the boat?
Yes.
 My knot-meter tells me about .5 kts in winds 12-13 knots in relatively
smooth water.

Someone wrote on this forum sometime time back that when they manually
held
their boom down by hand going downwind... that it was worth about 1/2 a
knot.      $ 150.00 dollars later, I can confirm that observation as
being
pretty much true.  There are a lot of factors that control boat speed
and
your results may vary.

In the final analysis; for most people, there are better ways to spend
your
money for 1/2 a knot.  For instance, a whisker pole for the Rhodes costs
about $ 150.00 dollars.  If you want real performance downwind, put a
spinnaker on the boat.  I was more interested in increasing efficiency
with
the sails I have.  I never have a crew and don't want a spinnaker, so
this
is what I did. IT DOES WHAT I WANTED IT TO DO. Which is my definition of
a
successful home project. If others are interested, post your comments
and I
will build a webpage with photos fully explaining how to build it.  It's
actually fairly simple.  You will have to decide if it is worth it to
you.

David Culp

Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:09:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Leland <LKUHN at cnmc.org>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list]  Was Sails Now Boom Vangs
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <27128980.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Rummy,

Since you brought up the winter topic and unlike you I won't be able to
sail
until the ice melts, how about them boom vangs?

Someone on this list has a removable vang that can be used with the
poptop
down but I normally sail with the poptop up and am too lazy to take a
vang
on and off.

I assume there is no practical means of keeping the boom down when the
poptop is up or Stan would have figured it out by now.  A reverse rigid
vang-like apparatus installed higher up on the mast could push the boom
down
but would probably interfere with the sail.  You could tie the end of
the
boom down using strategically placed cleats but that could involve a lot
of
cleats and a safety issue.  Even less safe would be a bag of weights
hanging
off the end of the boom--might be exciting during tacks and jibes.

Until someone comes up with a workable solution I guess I'll just keep
using
Boomer to hold things down, but my wife doesn't particularly like the
title
or the job.

Lee
1986 Rhodes22  At Ease
Kent Island, MD
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list

For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.




More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list