[Rhodes22-list] Jessica Watson

BenCittadino bencittadino at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 14:53:08 EST 2010


Rummy;

I would like to zero in on what I believe the most interesting part of this
story is. If we were talking about a competent (meaning mentally competent)
adult then I'm with you all the way. People ought to be able, without
interference from anyone, to take risks and have adventures so long as they
don't endanger others. My problem comes from the idea of children getting
into things that are inherently dangerous. Being a lawyer, I've been in the
"line drawing" business most of my life; at least I've been in the business
of figuring out where the line is ,or ought to be in the realm of human
activity. Does society, the government if you will, have any responsibility
to protect children from their own folly, or the folly of their parents?
Ever? I'll bet there are many things we could agree that ought to be illegal
for children, even smart, trained, skilled children. I'll bet we could agree
about an age that would be just too young to let that child try to sail
alone around the world. So where should the government draw that line?
Should parents always have the last word? I can see that since 18 is the age
of "majority" in most jurisdictions, and this kid is almost 17, that
somebody might make the judgment to let her try to sail around the world
alone. However, I do think myself that it is irresponsible and creates a
greater risk of involving the sea rescue resources of many countries than
seems reasonable. I would draw the line at 18 years. Would you draw any line
at all or just judge each case on an ad hoc basis? Can agree that Moses'
mother was guilty of child abuse casting him off to float away in a reed
basket down the river??

Best,

BenC 




R22RumRunner wrote:
> 
> John,
>  
> The bottle gets put away 2130 hours on weekdays and stays out all weekend.  
> I'm usually up pretty early because it's the only time of the day I can
> get 
> any  real work accomplished without interruptions from either the wife or 
> my  phone.
> This isn't about the haves and the have knots. This is a simple pursuit to  
> accomplish something that is extremely difficult and beyond the means and  
> abilities of most people. Why should you, or anyone for that matter, have 
> the  power to prevent her from doing this? She has a right to do this. She
> has 
> the  right to either succeed or fail without you or anyone else telling
> her 
> she can't  at least attempt this.
> I will now step down from the soap box.
>  
> Rummy
>  
>  
> In a message dated 1/27/2010 7:01:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
> jsbudda at verizon.net writes:
> 
> 
> Rummy,
> 
> If I remember correctly the only Rhodie on  enforced meds was the dearly
> departed Mr. Ed. Since the time stamp on your  post was 4:31 am I will 
> assume
> you were pretty far down the bottle at that  time and so will overlook
> your
> error as such. Also isn't this the same  sailor Hank-5 (not sure) wrote 
> about
> some months ago soliciting funds for  repairs because she came off second
> best playing bumper cars with a  freighter? Obviously her home schooling
> (which I consider an oxymoron by  the way) didn't include a copy of 
> Chapman's
> Piloting. I agree with Ben C on  this one, jail her parents for child
> endangerment. If their address was in  a trailer park, child and youth
> services would already be involved. I am  sick of seeing the haves
> thumbing
> their noses at the rules that are shoved  down my throat everyday. It's 
> about
> time they got a taste of there own  medicine.
> 
> John Shulick
> 
> Here is where Mr. Ed would say were all  socialists anyway
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> R22RumRunner wrote:
>> 
>>  I think someone forgot to take their meds today.
>> Before you judge  someone, try learning a little something about them. 
> She  
>> is  doing her school lessons and sends them by email and fax to her
>>  parents.  
>> Haven't you ever heard of home schooling?  
>>  
>> Rummy
>>  
>>  
>> In a  message dated 1/26/2010 8:33:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>>  jsbudda at verizon.net writes:
>> 
>> 
>> The  lesson this  spoiled brat will learn is that she is above the  rules
>>  established for normal people in this country. Check me if I'm wrong   
> but
>> don't 16 yr. olds have to go to high school. O I'm sorry  that's  only
>> required for people who can't buy their way out of  the system. See 
>> Tiger
>> Woods for more examples of sticking your  finger up the laws ass. If  I
>> smashed up a car while on  prescription meds what do you think would 
>> happen?
>> Could I  tell the law when I will decide to meet with them or would  I be
>>  hauled off to the nearest hospital foe a blood test. The lesson she 
>>  learns
>> will be that rules don't apply to her. 
>> 
>>  
>> R22RumRunner  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ben,
>>>  The life lessons this "little" girl will  have when she finishes  this
>>> voyage 
>>>  will benefit her for  an  entire lifetime. Nothing wrong with being 
>>> independent   and  being able to do things for oneself. I'm sure that
>>> her
>>>  parents  
>>> would never  have allowed her to do this if  she wasn't  qualified. She 
>> must
>>> have 
>>>  tremendous  sailing  skills.
>>>  
>>>  Rummy
>>>  
>>>  
>>> In  a message  dated 1/26/2010 11:33:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>>>   bencittadino at gmail.com writes:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rummy,  Ben &  Chris;
>>> 
>>> Please tell me you guys are  just  jerkin' my  chain. You don't really 
>> think
>>>  it's OK to send a child to sea   alone in a quest for...what?...some  
>> stupid
>>> "record". Maybe we should  stock  her up  with plenty of Mt. Gay? I have
>>> real
>>>  problems  with our "celebrity"  culture and this case just pushes   my
>>> buttons
>>> for some reason. Don't worry,  I'll  get over  it as soon as the 
> medicine 
>>> kicks
>>>  in.  
>>> 
>>>  BenC
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Geankoplis wrote:
>>>>   
>>>> Hey I think it  is great, beats joy riding with a bunch  of  drunk 18
>>>> year
>>>>  old
>>>>  boyfriends.
>>>>  
>>>>  Chris
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original    Message-----
>>>> From:   rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>>>>    [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of   Benjamin
>>>>  Cittadino
>>>> Sent: Monday, January  25,  2010 11:11
>>>> To:   rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>>>>  Subject: [Rhodes22-list]  Jessica  Watson
>>>> 
>>>>    
>>>> 
>>>> Does anybody else think the  parents of  this  child should be in jail?
>>>> 
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>> BenCittadino
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>   
>>>>  
>>>>   __________________________________________________
>>>>  To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>>>    http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>>   
>>>> For  the list Charter and help with using the mailing  list  and 
> archives
>>>> go
>>>>   to
>>>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>    __________________________________________________
>>>>   
>>>>    __________________________________________________
>>>>  To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>>>    http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>>   
>>>> For  the list Charter and help with using the mailing  list  and 
> archives
>>>> go
>>>>  to   http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>    __________________________________________________
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>> 
>>> --  
>>> View  this message in context:   
>>>  
>>  
> http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-a-Rhodes22-in-SW-Mihcigan-tp27047182p27325551.html
>>>   Sent  from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at    Nabble.com.
>>> 
>>>   __________________________________________________
>>> To    subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
>>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>  
>>> For  the list  Charter and help with using the mailing  list and 
> archives 
>> go  
>>> to   http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>   __________________________________________________
>>>  
>>>   __________________________________________________
>>> To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>  
>>> For  the list Charter and help with using the mailing list  and archives
>>> go
>>>  to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>   __________________________________________________
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> --  
>> View this message in context:   
>>  
> http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-a-Rhodes22-in-SW-Mihcigan-tp27047182p27332819.html
>>  Sent  from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at   Nabble.com.
>> 
>>  __________________________________________________
>> To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>> 
>> For  the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives 
> go  
>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  __________________________________________________
>> 
>>  __________________________________________________
>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>> 
>> For  the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
>> go
>>  to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  __________________________________________________
>> 
>> 
> 
> --  
> View this message in context:  
> http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-a-Rhodes22-in-SW-Mihcigan-tp27047182p27348989.html
> Sent  from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at  Nabble.com.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> 
> For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go 
> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> 
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-a-Rhodes22-in-SW-Mihcigan-tp27047182p27358781.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list