[Rhodes22-list] How to: A Trouble-free Furling Main | Sail Magazine

Mike Riter mike at traildesign.com
Sun Jul 19 22:30:32 EDT 2020


That's a really good looking sail Jay. Looking at the photo, I'm curious
about a couple things. First, did you have a Doyle before having the
Evolution made for your boat? And can you tell a noticable difference with
the extra batten?

Michael Riter
SV Emma B




On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:42 PM Jay Friedland <jayf401 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Tom,
> I opted to work with Evolution Sails in 2014, may be still in Easton, MD.,
> Scott Gibbs was the contact. They were good to work with, and the design
> was unique for our boat, straight leech, and 2 vertical battens, 1/4” round
> fiberglass rods, roughly at thirds, see attached photo, if it doesn’t get
> stripped away.
>
> Although I had some tweaks (more cosmetic than design- extended UV cover,
> tack line, R22 numbers, etc.) in the beginning, it’s performed flawlessly,
> especially this past year with Stan’s new outhaul car. I went through 2
> previous outhaul car designs over the last 6 years, which made it a little
> difficult to reef and furl in. The angle of the boom is critical to it’s
> compactness in the mast, and it’s original stiffness took a few weeks to
> settle in.
>
> Over the battenless version, I reef & furl on a port tack, although it goes
> right in when in irons or light winds (6-8 kts.) on starboard tack. It’s
> about the same size and was the same cost as the Doyle version, and about
> the same area UV cover. It is much stiffer than the single batten. If you
> ever in the Ocean County, NJ /Long Beach Island area, I go out at least 3-4
> times a week, now with masks, so a test sail is always available.
>
> Jay Friedland
> S/V Wanderlust, ‘97
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Jesse Shumaker <
> jesse.laten.shumaker at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The R22 IMF furls in the opposite direction as the illustration depicting
> the Selden furling shown in the article.  There is a vertical batten that
> is inserted into the UV resistant portion of the sail, which is the thick
> colored section that sticks out when the sail is fully furled.  Forgoing
> battens on the rest of the main seems to the price you pay in terms of
> performance in exchange for the big benefits in terms of ease of using
> IMF.  Horizontal battens are reserved for mains that hoist in the
> traditional manner, or perhaps they could also be used on boom roller
> furling, which seems to be less common than IMF.   I've not heard of anyone
> else adding additional vertical battens and I'm not sure the mast would be
> large enough to accommodate the extra size of a furled sail including
> vertical battens.
>
> I haven't yet sailed on a larger boat with IMF, but people who have used
> those and then come on my R22 seem to be surprised about the ability to
> raise and lower the entire system (boom and mainsail) with the pin going
> through the gooseneck to the mast.  I suppose that's not an option on a
> larger boat because of the extra weight.  It is nice to have a high boom
> normally for plenty of room in the cockpit and to catch the most wind up
> high, but then be able to lower it quickly in stronger conditions.
> Lowering the center of effort reduces heeling.
>
> Maybe Chris G. could provide some perspectives on IMF for the R22 vs. a
> larger boat since he also has a Catalina 38(?) with IMF.
>
> Jesse Shumaker
> S/V Zephyr
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 2:39 PM Tom Van Heule <
> tom.vanheule at intrinsicprograms.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, I came across this article today - and was searching in the archives
> for any details - lots of talk on the IMF, but nothing explaining the
> system (that I have found!).  Aside, Is anyone using battens? vertical or
> horizontal?    Is the GBI system similar/different from the Selden
> description?
> https://www.sailmagazine.com/diy/how-to-a-trouble-free-furling-main
>
> It was a nice read to hear some support for IMF in either case.
>
>
> --
> Tom Van Heule
> Intrinsic Programs
> tom.vanheule at intrinsicprograms.com
> +1 303 525 5266
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: R22.Vertical Battens.2017-10-04.jpg
> Type: image/jpeg
> Size: 2333129 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20200719/7ed8ab90/attachment.jpg
> >
>


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list