[Rhodes22-list] Monty was Mark's political

Rik Sandberg sanderico at earthlink.net
Fri Apr 23 18:41:08 EDT 2004 

Slim,

I think my boat is older than yours was. If I am not mistaken, it's hull 
#185. It's an '81. The guy that had it before me lived in Staples, Williams 
was his name, but I don't think he owned it that long. Can't remember the 
name of the guy before him. This boat is kinda off white/tan with a brown 
cove stripe. Couldn't tell you if it ever had another name or not. She is 
now called "Just Little"

Rik


At 05:03 PM 4/23/2004, you wrote:
>Rik,
>
>The Montgomery 15 was my first boat.  We loved it!  I sold it to a guy who
>later had some damage and repair to the port side like you described.
>That'd be too weird if you have my former M15.  The boats name was
>Moondance, IIRC hull # 402.  The guy I sold it to is Cal Spooner.
>
>Naturally, they have an e-mail list like us.  Some pretty knowledgeable
>sailors, esp. a gentleman named Connie.  He's sort of their Roger.  8-)
>
>Good luck with it!
>
>Slim
>
>On 4/23/04 4:15 PM, "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Wally,
> >
> > M-15 is coming pretty good. Didn't really have too much to do to get
> > sailable. Mostly just a good scrubbing, a little polish, a little tung
> > oil...I'm sure you know the drill. :-). I got a new rudder from Bob Eeg
> > that I still need to put on, but that's not going to take long, just one
> > bolt and a couple screws. Probably take about 20 minutes, once I finally
> > get to it. :-)
> >
> > It may be a bit before I can make the boat really pretty though. I have to
> > do some serious fairing on the port side, where it appears to have been
> > tied up against something pretty rough on a windy day. The PO smeared some
> > stuff on it and painted over it and I guess, from a distance it isn't real
> > obvious if you don't know it's there. Up close though, that patch of hull
> > (about 1 foot high and 2 feet long) looks like hell. But then, I guess
> > that's why it was cheap, eh??? That'll wait till I get ambitious in the
> > winter. "Course, once I do that, I'll have to paint the whole hull. Other
> > than that, she's a pretty cool little boat.
> >
> > Rik
> >
> >
> > At 03:35 PM 4/23/2004, you wrote:
> >> Rik, I agree we need to finish the job. No doubt that both sides are full
> >> of it.  I also agree that this is a perfect example of the pot calling the
> >> kettle black. I don't respect many on either side.
> >>
> >> Previous post (from Ed I think) indicated he thought Clinton's scandals
> >> were worse than Bush leading us to war. I just don't get this line of
> >> thinking.
> >>
> >> By the way how is that M15 coming along?
> >>
> >> Wally
> >>
> >>> From: Rik Sandberg <sanderico at earthlink.net>
> >>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mark's political instigation aggravated
> >>> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:04:28 -0500
> >>>
> >>> Wally,
> >>>
> >>> Excuse me, but there are many Democrats here and elsewhere that have
> >>> accused our President of lying about the situation with WMD in Iraq. I
> >>> posted those quotes, all from Democrats BTW, to show that there were
> >>> plenty of liars out there from both sides,,,,,or not. The Democrats all
> >>> jumping up to call the President a liar now is a perfect example of the
> >>> pot calling the kettle black.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Whether we should have gone there or not, it seems to me, is a moot point
> >>> now. We are there, we need to finish the job as best we can.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> At 09:23 AM 4/23/2004, you wrote:
> >>>> I for one felt the attack on Iraq was wrong regardless of WMD. I agree
> >>>> that they had them at one time. However we don't know if they still
> >>>> exist or not inspite of our attack. The below quotes don't sway my 
> opinion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Times are tough when the conservatives have to use quotes from the
> >>>> liberals to help make their case. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Wally
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: Rik Sandberg <sanderico at earthlink.net>
> >>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mark's political instigation aggravated
> >>>>> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:44:12 -0500
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Take a read here guys, then maybe talk about who is BSing who in 
> regards
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> WMDs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rik
> >>>>> ______________________________________________________
> >>>>> I ran across this recently and found it very good reading.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you really believe that President BUSH lied,THAT THERE NEVER 
> WERE ANY
> >>>>> WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ AND HE TOOK US TO WAR SOLELY FOR
> >>>>> HIS OIL
> >>>>> BUDDIES -- The truth and nothing but the truth should be known!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
> >>>>> develop
> >>>>> weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That 
> is our
> >>>>> bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is 
> clear.
> >>>>> We
> >>>>> want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
> >>>>> destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters 
> a great
> >>>>> deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
> >>>>> nuclear,
> >>>>> chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
> >>>>> security threat we face." -Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten 
> times
> >>>>> since 1983." -Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb,
> >>>>> 18,1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with 
> the U.S.
> >>>>> Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
> >>>>> appropriate,air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
> >>>>> effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
> >>>>> mass
> >>>>> destruction programs." -Letter to President Clinton, signed by 
> Sens. Carl
> >>>>> Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
> >>>>> destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region 
> and he
> >>>>> has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy
> >>>>> Pelosi (D,
> >>>>> CA), Dec. 16, 1998
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
> >>>>> destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton
> >>>>> Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
> >>>>> programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear 
> programs
> >>>>> continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, 
> Saddam
> >>>>> continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover
> >>>>> of a
> >>>>> licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will
> >>>>> threaten the
> >>>>> United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by
> >>>>> Sen. Bob
> >>>>> Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
> >>>>> threat
> >>>>> to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated
> >>>>> of the
> >>>>> United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the 
> means
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
> >>>>> weapons
> >>>>> throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
> >>>>> deter
> >>>>> and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
> >>>>> power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
> >>>>> developing
> >>>>> weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
> >>>>> confident
> >>>>> that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological
> >>>>> weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build 
> up his
> >>>>> chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports
> >>>>> indicate
> >>>>> that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), 
> Oct. 3,
> >>>>> 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
> >>>>> authority to
> >>>>> use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
> >>>>> that a
> >>>>> deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a 
> real and
> >>>>> grave threat to our security." -Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 
> 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
> >>>>> aggressively to
> >>>>> develop nuclear weapons an d will likely have nuclear weapons within
> >>>>> the next
> >>>>> five years ... We also should remember we have always 
> underestimated the
> >>>>> progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass 
> destruction." -
> >>>>> Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
> >>>>> every
> >>>>> significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and 
> destroy his
> >>>>> chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
> >>>>> refused to do" Rep.- Henry Waxman (D, CA) , Oct. 10, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological 
> weapons
> >>>>> stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
> >>>>> also
> >>>>> given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
> >>>>> members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical 
> warfare,
> >>>>> and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary
> >>>>> Clinton (D,
> >>>>> NY), Oct 10, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
> >>>>> Saddam
> >>>>> Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity
> >>>>> for the
> >>>>> production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob
> >>>>> Graham (D,
> >>>>> FL), Dec. 8, 2002
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
> >>>>> murderous
> >>>>> dictator, leading an oppressive regime .. He presents a particularly
> >>>>> grievous
> >>>>> threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... 
> And now
> >>>>> he
> >>>>> is is cal culating America's response to his continued deceit and his
> >>>>> consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of
> >>>>> Saddam
> >>>>> Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real - Sen. John F. 
> Kerry (D,
> >>>>> MA), Jan. 23. 2003
> >>>>>
> >>>>> SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
> >>>>> WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL 
> BUDDIES???
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So who's bullshitting who here????
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 22 2004 10:18 am, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>> I still find it funny that the below comments still
> >>>>>> come up.  We still don't know what happen to Iraq
> >>>>>> WMDs.  We know he made missles that were cabible of
> >>>>>> going past the UN limit.  Warheads were cabable of
> >>>>>> carring chemical agents. That 20+ tons of Mustard gas
> >>>>>> that Libia gave up may be Irag.  We are still finding
> >>>>>> Jets & all other kinds of stuff hid under the sand in
> >>>>>> Irag.  UN thought Iraq had WMDs, Briton, US and most
> >>>>>> of the free world thought Irag had them.  I believe
> >>>>>> the real question is not whether Iraq had WMDs but
> >>>>>> WHERE are the WMDs!  Sylia, Iran? Two very good
> >>>>>> possibities!!!!!!!!!!!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As for Nation Building, when a country such as our
> >>>>>> looses 3,000 people; a President must change, policy
> >>>>>> must change; to protect the people that are still
> >>>>>> alive.  Otherwise, the US would have had more Deaths
> >>>>>> on it hands.  And the President would have been blamed
> >>>>>> for NOT changeing policies to protect this country.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I had a great weekend sailing last weekend also.
> >>>>>> Perfect wind, some fairly good wave action.  It was
> >>>>>> even white capping most of the day Saturday.
> >>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --- Wally Buck <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Ed,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The answer to your questions are easy, I am just not
> >>>>>>> sure why people care so
> >>>>>>> much. Yes there is a sucker born every minute! It is
> >>>>>>> clear that Clinton lied
> >>>>>>> to cover up his sucker. The guy got caught messing
> >>>>>>> around and lied about it.
> >>>>>>> Not exactly uncommon in our society or from our
> >>>>>>> elected officials. Please
> >>>>>>> note I did not vote for Clinton and agree the guy
> >>>>>>> was sleezy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On the other hand we have a sitting president that
> >>>>>>> claimed while running for
> >>>>>>> office that he was against Nation Building. Once
> >>>>>>> elected he spread around a
> >>>>>>> bunch of rumors as facts leading us into war against
> >>>>>>> a nation that posed no
> >>>>>>> real threat to our National Security. This pisses me
> >>>>>>> off much more.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regarding the Baker's, they are clowns and are only
> >>>>>>> here for us to make fun
> >>>>>>> of. :-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We had an awesome weekend last week! More of the
> >>>>>>> same coming this weekend. I
> >>>>>>> hope someone else besides me is going sailing.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Wally
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Mark's political
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> instigation aggravated Date: Wed,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 21 Apr 2004 15:10:16 -0400
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Mark,
> >>>>>>>>   If you like the what she says then surely you
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> believed Bill when he
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> said "I did not ................................."
> >>>>>>>>   What did that famous circus guy say, "one born
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> every day and two to
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> take him."  You have found your two.  And I bet you
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> sat in the front row of
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jim Baker's audiences.
> >>>>>>>>   And if Bill is as smart as Rummy's email says he
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> is, how come he
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> does not know right from wrong?  Or the complete
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> definitions of everyday
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> terms.  Why is it acceptable for him to define
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> words to suit himself and
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> then all the national news media accepts his
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> definition as correct?  Is
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> intelligence or an old fashion 'con job'.
> >>>>>>>>   And, according to Rummy's email, Bush is not smart
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> enough to 'con'
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> us :-) :-(
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ~~~~~ _/) ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                               Ed K
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >>>>>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Behalf Of Mark Kaynor
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:37 PM
> >>>>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Rummy's political
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> instigation aggravated
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This oughtta do it. I just watched Hillary Clinton
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> on Larry King Live. I
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> keep finding that I like what she has to say.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >>>>>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org]On
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Behalf Of Michael Meltzer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:35 PM
> >>>>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rummy's political
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> instigation aggravated
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> good point, I am not getting any, so why not bring
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> up sex, thats different.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> MJM
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>> From: "Mark Kaynor" <mark at kaynor.org>
> >>>>>>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:35 PM
> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Rummy's political
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> instigation aggravated
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ed, Rummy,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <Yawn> <Ho hum> How about bringing up something
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> controversial? <g>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Mark
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >>>>>>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org]On
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Behalf Of ed kroposki
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:41 PM
> >>>>>>>>> To: 'The Rhodes 22 mail list'
> >>>>>>>>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Rummy's political
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> instigation aggravated
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Rummy,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>     I would suggest that your data is biased.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let me change the subject
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> a more controversial one, Religion:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As you walk up the steps to the
> >>>>>>>>> building which houses the
> >>>>>>>>> U.S.  Supreme Court you can see
> >>>>>>>>> near the top of the building a row of the
> >>>>>>>>> world's law givers and each one
> >>>>>>>>> is facing one in the middle who
> >>>>>>>>> is facing forward with a full frontal
> >>>>>>>>> view - it is Moses and he is holding the Ten
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Commandments!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As you enter the Supreme Court
> >>>>>>>>> courtroom, the two huge oak doors
> >>>>>>>>> have the Ten Commandments engraved
> >>>>>>>>> on each lower portion of each door.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As you sit inside the courtroom, you can
> >>>>>>>>> see the wall, right above where the
> >>>>>>>>> Supreme Court judges sit, a display of the Ten
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Commandments!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There are Bible verses etched in stone
> >>>>>>>>> all over the Federal Buildings
> >>>>>>>>> and Monuments in Washington, D.C.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> James Madison, the fourth president,
> >>>>>>>>> known as "The Father of Our Constitution"
> >>>>>>>>> made the following statement
> >>>>>>>>> "We have staked the whole of
> >>>>>>>>> all our political institutions upon the
> >>>>>>>>> capacity of mankind for self-government,
> >>>>>>>>> upon the capacity of each and all of us
> >>>>>>>>> to govern ourselves, to control ourselves,
> >>>>>>>>> to sustain ourselves according to the Ten
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Commandments of God."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Patrick Henry, that patriot and
> >>>>>>>>> Founding Father of our country said,
> >>>>>>>>> "It cannot be emphasized too strongly
> >>>>>>>>> or too often that this great nation was
> >>>>>>>>> founded not by religionists but by Christians,
> >>>>>>>>> not on religions but on the
> >>>>>>>>> Gospel of Jesus Christ."
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Every session of Congress begins with
> >>>>>>>>> a prayer by a paid preacher,  whose
> >>>>>>>>> salary has been paid by the
> >>>>>>>>> taxpayer since 1777.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Fifty-two of the 55 founders of the
> >>>>>>>>> Constitution were members of
> >>>>>>>>> the established orthodox churches
> >>>>>>>>> in the colonies.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> DID YOU KNOW?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thomas Jefferson worried that
> >>>>>>>>> the Courts would overstep their
> >>>>>>>>> authority and instead of interpreting
> >>>>>>>>> the law would begin making
> >>>>>>>>> law....an oligarchy....the rule of few over
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> many.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ed K (throwing gas on Rummy's wood fire)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Name:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> !cid_008701c343d6$e7c781e0$6402a8c0 at desktop.gif
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Type: image/gif Size:
> >>>>>>>> 5747 bytes Desc: not available
> >>>>>>>> Url:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200404/21/cid_
> >>>>> 00 8701
> >>>>>>> c343d6e7c781e06402a8c0desktop.gif
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ­ get
> >>>>>>> it now!
> >>>>>>> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> __________________________________
> >>>>>> Do you Yahoo!?
> >>>>>> Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
> >>>>>> http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
> >>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>>
> >>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ­ get it now!
> >>>> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> >>>>
> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page ­ FREE
> >> download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>__________________________________________________
>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list

More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list