[Rhodes22-list] (political) response to Brad

Cheryl O'Grady cheryl.ogrady at mail.com
Mon Nov 21 16:20:30 EST 2005


We didn't need to bring it up, it was out there for everyone to know.  I think we are pointing out the hypocrisy of you folks who complained loudly for 8 years that he was a draft dodger, but have remained largely mum about the dodging of the leaders of the current war administration.

I personally think everyone who could have did the right thing to avoid going to VietNam, unless of course they wanted to stand around calling names at people who did actually show up there.  


----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] (political) response to Brad
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:38 -0600

> 
> Oh my, now you know what I think? Wow, I'm impressed.
> 
> Hate to stomp all over your "knowledge", but I hardly think he 
> deserves a Mt Rushmore addition. Personally, I don't like any of 
> the faces being on Mt Rushmore, so I don't want any added to it.
> 
> I do find it entertaining though, that Bush should abdicate his 
> role as commander in chief because he was a "draft dodger", but you 
> folks never brought that up with President Clinton.
> 
> In ya'lls mind, exactly what is it that qualifies one to make those decisions?
> 
> I hated Clinton. I was disappointed both times he won. But, that's 
> about as far as it went. Disappointment, "wasted trips" to the 
> voting booth, and something of a "I told you so" attitude with 
> friends that voted for him. However, I never once questioned his 
> "right" to command the troops. WE gave him that right when WE voted 
> him into office, whether some of us liked giving it to him or not.
> 
> This notion that his "dodge of the draft" was OK, but the 
> vice-president's wasn't (at least Rummy, the VP Rummy, stayed in 
> the country), all based on the notion that Rummy had and used 
> "privilege" and Clinton didn't, smacks of elitism, or maybe reverse 
> elitism.
> 
> But then, why would I expect Cheryl's explanation to make sense. 
> She's the one that maintains a 5% difference against exit polls is 
> insignificant when she wants it to be, but 3% constitutes voter 
> fraud.
> 
> Like I said, you folks are funny.
> 
> Herb Parsons
> 
> S/V O'Jure
>    1976 O'Day 25
>    Lake Grapevine, N TX
> 
> S/V Reve de Papa
>    1971 Coronado 35
>    Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana Coast
> 
> >>> SMutart at CWRLaw.com 11/21/2005 3:35:16 PM >>>
> Nope, not yet. There is just too much good stuff going on with you 
> folks. Herb and Ed obviously think W someday will be on Mt Rushmore 
> (and if there is ever a movement to put someone's rear end on the 
> Mountain, this is the hands down winner ), With wit and insight 
> from the likes of Slim,  Rummy and now hearing that Bill is back, 
> it's just too much for this landlubber to walk away from. so 
> Cheryl, go after them.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com [mailto:R22RumRunner at aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:25 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] (political) response to Brad
> 
> 
> I thought you left us?
> 
> R
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list





"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."  Edmund Burke, Irish philosopher



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list