[Rhodes22-list] regarding request to MJM

[TN Rhodey]

Bud,

I agree, if Tootle um I mean Ed can use Nabble it must be easy! :-)

So for new post we would need to go to Nabble but to reply we could use 
Nabble or standard email?

Actually I never create a "new" email for this list, I always just hit reply 
and change subject.  Would that still work? Yeah most likely not .....

I must admit that I like things the way they are.

Wally
>From: Bud <budconnor at earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] regarding request to MJM
>Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:26:08 -0400
>
>
>First, I apologize for the way recommendation #3 read - it was not what I 
>meant
>to say or imply.  Looking over how nabble works, no changes are required to
>the rhodes email list. Nothing. Nada. It all stays the same.  The only 
>change
>required is people's behavior, that is - the way people would post a new
>message to the list.
>
>I am recommending that folks enter their "new post" messages in a text box
>on the Rhodes forum, but keep doing all their "replies" as they always 
>have,
>through their mail tool of choice. (You can read messages and reply via 
>nabble
>too if you want.) It cannot be all that hard as Ed has been using nabble 
>for what -
>the last 6 months?  Ed has been an early adopter of nabble, and has not 
>gone back.
>
>Right now the Rhodes forum over on nabble is a copy of all Rhodes list
>email messages in one big long list.  So,  I would like to do a quick 
>survey
>to see if people would even consider using the existing Rhodes forum:
>
>1) If you had a question about Anchors, would you be willing to go to
>    the Rhodes "Anchors" forum and search there first?
>
>2) If you did not find the answer you needed, would you be willing
>     to post your question to the Rhodes "Anchors" forum?
>
>3) If you were going to post a new message to the Rhodes list,
>     would you be willing to post it in a suitable Rhodes forum
>     on the nabble Rhodes web page?
>
>Thanks,
>Bud
>
>
>Bill Effros wrote:
>
>>Ed,
>>
>>Thanks.  You are completely right, and since Michael has been through all 
>>this before, I know he knows it, too.
>>
>>No time to review the history right now, but we know there is a reason for 
>>the long standing success of this forum, and that the way Michael has run 
>>it is the reason.
>>
>>Anyone who wants to split off and do something else is welcome to do so.  
>>I'm staying here.
>>
>>BTW in my personal filing system I have more than 400 categories, and it's 
>>not enough.
>>
>>Bill Effros
>>
>>Tootle wrote:
>>
>>>Michael,
>>>     Please disregard internecine comments of about ceasing this forum.  
>>>What
>>>the current interlopers have not realized and fully appreciated that the 
>>>all
>>>encompassing format and ease of just hitting reply for many is the source 
>>>of
>>>good activity of this list.
>>>     Now if the interlopers wish to categorize the post for the masses 
>>>after
>>>posting to the list for the benefit of others, they are welcome to try. 
>>>However, I think that they need to get written releases of the original
>>>posters to do so.
>>>
>>>Ed K
>>>Greenville, SC, USA
>>>
>>>      --
>>>View this message in context: 
>>>http://www.nabble.com/Arrrgh%21-t1833954.html#a5010690
>>>Sent from the Rhodes22 forum at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>__________________________________________________
>>>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>
>__________________________________________________
>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list