[Rhodes22-list] WTF? (response to Hank and Tootle)

Bill Effros bill at effros.com
Sat May 20 10:33:43 EDT 2006


bullshit.

Bill Effros

brad haslett wrote:
> Wally,
>
> OK, here's a quick shot to clarify things before the
> boys put my arse on a machine.  If you read through
> the report, Saddam's generals thought they had WMD. 
> They had WMDs at one time, they used WMDs. They wanted
> more. We still don't know where they went.  Saddam
> sponsored terrorism all over the Middle East.  Clinton
> thought he should be taken out.  So did Gore, so did
> Kerry.  It is easy to second guess the decision to go
> to war after the fact, but post 9/11, given the
> intelligence we had, it was a tough call (unless
> you're a pacifist or an isolationist).  We went, we're
> there.  These calls for an early withdrawal are
> nonsense.  Do you know why the loss of our kids to
> IEDs has gone up?  The insurgents are getting C4 from
> Iran that is seven times more powerful. The argument
> that we wouldn't have these problems had we not gone
> there doesn't fly with me.  Why fight the war in
> Europe when it was Japan that attacked us?   This is a
> war like no other, the front is hard to define and
> constantly shifting. IF Iraq can become a stable
> nation, it will shift the whole Middle East.  We've
> had enough "meet and greets" in the Rose Garden.  The
> world is too small and the Middle East too important
> to ignore. Whether Iraq was the best move won't be
> determined for a long time.  NEWS FLASH!  Bush will be
> gone soon.  Hillary, or whoever, will face the same
> problems.  The folks who want to take us back to the
> seventh century don't give a shit who's next.  The
> problem remains the same. As to the folks who are in
> Iraq now, they deserve our support.  The re-inlistment
> rate and requests for redeployment to Iraq is
> incredible.  They believe in what they are doing.  You
> have to read the soldiers blogs to get that story
> though, it won't sell soap for the MSM.
>
> Brad
>
> --- TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Brad,
>>
>> I am not sure I follow what you are saying. Perhaps
>> someone else posted on 
>> military families.
>>
>> Many of us do try to remove emotion and look at the
>> facts.  It reallky isn't 
>> THAT hard. One first has to have an open mind. Again
>> your link did not 
>> reveal anything that would change my mind. It seemed
>> to support what i said. 
>> We rushed into this on bad information. I have said
>> this from day one. Am I 
>> missing something?
>>
>> Your ask for forgiveness rather than permission
>> concept is a pretty low 
>> standard. I think we should aim a little higher.
>>
>> Wally
>>
>>
>>     
>>> From: brad haslett <flybrad at yahoo.com>
>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
>>>       
>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>     
>>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
>>>       
>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>     
>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] WTF? (response to Hank
>>>       
>> and Tootle)
>>     
>>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
>>>
>>> Wally,
>>>
>>> My attitude is "better to ask forgiveness than
>>> permission" when it comes to national security. No
>>>       
>> one
>>     
>>> is going to give up their political position based
>>> only the facts; mostly it is emotion.  I just spent
>>> the evening celebrating my oldest son's 24th
>>>       
>> birthday
>>     
>>> on the  MS Gulf coast.  I'm not going to second
>>>       
>> guess
>>     
>>> anyone's influence on their child not to go to THE
>>> GULF.  My graditude goes to those kids who did, and
>>> especially to those parents whose kids didn't come
>>> back.
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>> --- TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Brad,
>>>>
>>>> I skimmed through reading things here and there
>>>>         
>> but
>>     
>>>> didn't come across
>>>> anything that changes my mind. In fact I read
>>>> several things that confirmed
>>>> my way of thinking. Most interesting is the
>>>>         
>> coverage
>>     
>>>> of WMD. Looked to me
>>>> like they cited many sources showing that there
>>>> weren't any WMD left and we
>>>> bought into the boasts of Saddam.
>>>>
>>>> Wally
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> From: brad haslett <flybrad at yahoo.com>
>>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
>>>>>           
>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>         
>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
>>>>>           
>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>         
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] WTF? (response to
>>>>>           
>> Hank
>>     
>>>> and Tootle)
>>>>         
>>>>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 05:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>>
>>>>> Wally,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is some "light" reading for you (230
>>>>>           
>> pages).
>>     
>>>>> I've read some excerpts and analysis but
>>>>>           
>> haven't
>>     
>>>>> digested the whole document.  Hope to get that
>>>>>           
>> done
>>     
>>>>> this week if I can get away from the 'Tower of
>>>>>           
>>>> Babel'.
>>>>         
>>>>> Brad
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>> http://www.foreignaffairs.org/special/iraq/ipp.pdf
>>>       
>>>>> --- TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> I also saw (on TV) Colin Powell give a
>>>>>>             
>>>> powerpoint
>>>>         
>>>>>> presentaion to the UN
>>>>>> showing location of WMD. If it makes you
>>>>>>             
>> feel
>>     
>>>> any
>>>>         
>>>>>> better I blame congress
>>>>>> almost as much as Bush. Fiew had the
>>>>>>             
>> strength to
>>     
>>>>>> vote against the
>>>>>> resolution. Face it. we acted on
>>>>>>             
>> mis-information
>>     
>>>> and
>>>>         
>>>>>> made some bad
>>>>>> decisions. I don't understand why this is so
>>>>>>             
>>>> hard
>>>>         
>>>>>> for people to see.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really like my local Congressman Jim
>>>>>>             
>> Duncan.
>>     
>>>> He is
>>>>         
>>>>>> one of the few who
>>>>>> voted against the resolution and he is a
>>>>>>             
>>>> republican.
>>>>         
>>>>>> There was no reason to
>>>>>> attack Iraq when we did. The borders were
>>>>>>             
>> locked
>>     
>>>>>> down about as well as you
>>>>>> can lock down a border. Heck we can't even
>>>>>>             
>>>> control
>>>>         
>>>>>> our border. We also
>>>>>> controlled the airways. We had not yet
>>>>>>             
>> finished
>>     
>>>> in
>>>>         
>>>>>> Afghanastan. We should
>>>>>> have confirmed all of our information first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I should remove logic from my thought
>>>>>>             
>>>> process
>>>>         
>>>>>> and just follow party
>>>>>> line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wally
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> From: "Herb Parsons"
>>>>>>>               
>> <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
>>     
>>>>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] WTF? (response
>>>>>>>               
>> to
>>     
>>>> Hank
>>>>         
>>>>>> and Tootle)
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:25:53 -0500
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reasons "Bush and his cronies" (I
>>>>>>>               
>> assume,
>>     
>>>> that
>>>>         
>>>>>> by 'Bush and his
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> cronies', you are referring to the US
>>>>>>>               
>> Congress,
>>     
>>>>>> since they are the body
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> that authorized and voted for the
>>>>>>>               
>> resolution)
>>     
>>>> are
>>>>         
>>>>>> clearly laid out in the
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> resolution authorizing the action. You HAVE
>>>>>>>               
>>>> read
>>>>         
>>>>>> it, haven't you?
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Herb Parsons
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> S/V O'Jure
>>>>>>> 1976 O'Day 25
>>>>>>> Lake Grapevine, N TX
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> S/V Reve de Papa
>>>>>>> 1971 Coronado 35
>>>>>>> Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana Coast
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>> saroj at pathfind.net 5/14/2006 12:29:40
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>> pm
>>     
>>>>>>> To Hank:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Exactly what do you believe WAS the reason
>>>>>>>               
>> Bush
>>     
>>>> and
>>>>         
>>>>>> his cronies decided to
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> go to war in Iraq?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The stated reason was that Iraq harbored Al
>>>>>>>               
>>>> Qaeda
>>>>         
>>>>>> terrorists and Sadaam was
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> a recalcitrant tyrant and had WMD which he
>>>>>>>               
>>>> planned
>>>>         
>>>>>> to use against us.  That
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> he was a tyrant there is no doubt.  Is it
>>>>>>>               
>> the
>>     
>>>> job
>>>>         
>>>>>> of the U.S.A. to
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> eliminate
>>>>>>> all tyrants from this world? There are
>>>>>>>               
>> plenty
>>
>>     
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>   


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list