[Rhodes22-list] GPS/Depth Sounder Questions

[KUHN, LELAND]

Dave,

I agree with Mike that a depth finder is not required, but I'll never be
without one.  In addition to using it for anchoring, I occasionally like
to sail close to the shore, and many shorelines go from deep to shallow
water in no time at all.

As for GPS, I've a handheld with a relatively big display.  If I prop it
up next to the sink, I can read it from just about anywhere in the
cockpit (sitting starboard requires a little leaning).  If no one is
sitting against the leeward side of the cabin, I prop it up on the seat.
Both positions require something (genoa line, sailing glove, towel,
etc.) to secure it during heavy wind tacks.

Lee
1986 Rhodes22  At Ease
Crab Alley (Kent Island, MD)



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael D. Weisner [mailto:mweisner at ebsmed.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:03 PM
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] GPS/Depth Sounder Questions

David,

I mounted my GPS (old Garmin unit) on the tiller handle, just behind the

clip for the hiking stick.  It is out of the way but still close enough
to 
read easily.  Prior to mounting it, I used to keep it in a mesh sack
hanging 
from the stern rail, but this proved too hard to access when needed
(time to 
power up and acquire).  My only problem nowadays is that I need more
light 
to read these devices in darkness than the small light puts out.

As far as depth meters, I too do not like to make holes in perfectly
sound 
hulls.  I have discussed this before on the list (Nov 21, 2006) as
follows:

"The R22 drafts so little that a depth finder is not required - mine was

acquired as a gift.  It sat for 3 years waiting for me to make a hole in
the 
boat for it, something that I do not like to do.  Finally, I tried
"shooting 
through the hull" (no hole) in the front of the Lazarette and found that
it 
was reasonably accurate.  Great toy for people to watch but virtually 
useless on a craft that drafts 2 feet with a kick up rudder and 
centerboard."

If you really feel the need for a depth meter, the location that I chose
to 
place the transducer was on the floor of the Laz (bottom of boat),  just

behind the cockpit drain fitting.  You can test it in the water by just 
placing the transducer at this point and placing a fender or suitable 
"wedge" to put downwards pressure on the transducer and power up the
unit. 
You may need to move it around to get the best placement.  Once epoxied
in 
place, check the calibration by measuring actual depth and compare.
Mine 
was about 3 inches off at anchor and very consistent while underway,
except 
when heeled.

Mike
s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY

From: "David Bradley" <dwbrad at gmail.com> Monday, July 02, 2007 3:03 PM
> We're getting ready for a San Juan Islands trip in August and need to
get
> set up with GPS and depth sounder.  I have two questions for the list:
>
> 1.  Has anyone had success mounting a GPS unit on a swivel arm, either
on
> the stern rail or on the transom?  I'm considering a swivel arm that
would
> stay on the stern rail and the unit could be turned to face either 
> Captain's
> chair.  The unit would have to be removable with wing nuts or
something 
> like
> that.  I've got 12V power in the cockpit through the laz, so that part

> would
> be easy.
>
> 2.  Has anyone had any recent experience with the in-hull (puck-shape)

> style
> of depth sounder transducer?  I have this aversion to drilling holes
in my
> boat (hence the jury rig above), and don't want to have to pull the
boat 
> out
> of the water if that can be avoided.  I'm wondering about the
possibility 
> of
> an in-hull transducer in the lazerette just to the side of the keel
area.
> They were skeptical at West Marine, but they don't understand the
flatter
> hull design of our boat.
>
> I have a hand-held depth sounder which I could still use if needed -
have
> never had the need and have been lucky enough not to find a bottom...
but
> that won't last.  Could also use a hand-held GPS but the display on
the
> fixed mount GPS units is sooooo much better and there is much more
data
> available.  Am thinking that I really should have a chart plotter when
> venturing into Puget Sound and the San Juans.
>
> Any recent experiences and perspectives will be appreciated, as
always.
>
> Dave B
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> 



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.