[Rhodes22-list] Continuing replies for Wally

[TN Rhodey]

Thanks for re-posting...I missed the first one.. Please note the first
section that lists the members of Senate. it does not list VP. It does state
the VP sits as President of the Senate.

Lets assume that your position is correct.... are you agreeing  that
Congress can shut down funding? If he is in the Legislative branch they
would have the power to do so. Also I will refer you back the the part of
the Constitution that lists who are members of the Legislative branch. As
you should have noted it makes no mention of VP. No disagreement that he
sits as head and acts as tie breaker.

The point is he can't be in both. I still don't think you understand that..

Anyone watching the AC race....team NZ at one point had 3
spinnakers."flying"..one shredded in the water....one flying snarled beyond
use...and a third hour glassed for a while and finally opening. They looked
worse than my local club!

Wally

On 6/29/07, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
>
>
> Wally said, "Wally said, "Mike, I have been on the Rhodes list longer than
> Ed."
>
> Then Wally replied, "I  found the Sailnet list looking for info on the
> Rhodes Bantam. I am
> guessing sometime in 1999 or 2000. Who cares and  why?  Because of what
> you
> said first.  I can remember when this guy from Tennessee started asking
> questions on the old list.  I was on that list quite a while before I went
> to visit a slick roofing salesman from Anderson, SC.  However, you are
> right, I did not used to say much.  Back then I worked 60 hours a week.
>
> Then you said, "Still waiting for documentation supporting your claim that
> the Constitution
> puts VP in Legislative branch."  On one of my earlier replies I posted
> that
> part of the Constitution that said what the VP of USA is and does.  So I
> will attach it again
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p11360274/Const%2B3a.JPG Const+3a.JPG
>
> Maybe we can get Frone to enlighten you about priviledged communications.
> He is loathed to do so because we are not paying him for his expertize.
> However, that is what that fight is all about.  However, the New York
> Times
> just may be wrong on that issue.
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
> attachment:
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p11360274/times%2B%25232.bmp times+%232.bmp
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Iraq-my-continuing-rant%21-tf3989450.html#a11360274
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>