[Rhodes22-list] Slim's response - non sailing, religious, etc.

Herb Parsons hparsons at parsonsys.com
Tue Nov 25 16:27:00 EST 2008


I don't believe I've ever told anyone on here that they need to change 
their beliefs, so you'll pardon me if I take your view with a bit of a 
grain of salt.

As for the strangers knocking on your door, they're just like any other 
advertisers. If you don't want them, I'd suggest a simple sign that says 
"No solicitors". Most are smart enough to know that if they ignore the 
sign, they're really not going to get very far.

As for your neighbors, friends, and even family trying to "impose" on 
you, have you ever thought that maybe, if you meant nothing to them, 
they wouldn't care. One of the worst things in the world a person can do 
is to convince those around him that they abandon their concern for him.


Steven Alm wrote:
> No, Herb, it's not imposing.  It simply states an opinion.  No one said to
> you that you need to change your beliefs.  In fact the church, friends,
> neighbors and even family have done their best to impose their beliefs on me
> and others all my life.  Strangers even come knocking on my door!  And I
> expect the bombardment will continue.  The older I get, the less patience I
> have for it and feel like standing up and saying, "Wait a minute..."
>
> The musician you quoted also wrote:
>
> People are crazy and times are strange,
> I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range,
> I used to care but things have changed.
>
> Slim
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com>wrote:
>
>   
>> And Robert,
>>
>> What constitutes "telling them what to believe". If you, or someone
>> else, tells me my beliefs are myths, or are kooky, or extreme, or
>> whatever, are you imposing YOUR beliefs system on me?
>>
>>
>> Robert Skinner wrote:
>>     
>>> Perhaps, Ed, we all have to find our own answers -
>>> or live with the idea that there are none that
>>> are provable to our own satisfaction.
>>>
>>> The trouble, as I see it, and as I suspect Slim
>>> sees it, comes when anyone - repeat, ANYONE -
>>> becomes so absolutely certain that they have THE
>>> answers that they feel that they have the right
>>> to impose their way of belief on someone else, -
>>> perhaps even to the point of killing them to
>>> save? their souls?.
>>>
>>> I say that everyone has the right to go to Hell
>>> in their own way.  In the mean time, they have
>>> no right to tell me what to believe.
>>>
>>> As to what belief governs my actions - that is
>>> my problem, no one else's.
>>>
>>> /Robert
>>>
>>> Tootle wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Slim said, "Religion throughout all civilizations serve to answer three
>>>> questions:  Where did we
>>>> come from?  How shall we live?  What happens when we die?"
>>>>
>>>> Captain Alm, without religion where are humans supposed to get
>>>>         
>> guidelines on
>>     
>>>> the middle question you pose?
>>>>
>>>> Are they supposed to get them from the Marxist indoctrination proffered
>>>>         
>> by
>>     
>>>> Mr. Bill Ayers?
>>>>
>>>> You forgot to delineate a suggested answer to your question.
>>>>
>>>> Consider that some religions have a couple of thousand years of
>>>>         
>> experience,
>>     
>>>> trial and error, see what works with humans to answer that question.
>>>> Whereas, Marxism has a little over 100 years of experience with most of
>>>>         
>> its
>>     
>>>> demonstrations disasters.  And disasters should be capitalized as having
>>>> been unmitigated disasters.  Which system has raised the overall
>>>>         
>> standard of
>>     
>>>> living in the world the most?  The answer is not a Marxist based system
>>>> which our new President represents.
>>>>
>>>> A capitalist system based on freedom with a sheriff enforcing standards
>>>>         
>> of
>>     
>>>> honesty has helped mankind the most.  Rather than compulsory taking from
>>>> those who make the most efforts to achieve and giving to those who need,
>>>>         
>> it
>>     
>>>> loosely achieves results by rewarding effort.  Those who achieve drag
>>>>         
>> the
>>     
>>>> dregs and unable up by raising the overall standard of living.
>>>>
>>>> When you compel those who achieve or are able to achieve to maintain
>>>>         
>> those
>>     
>>>> who want the same standard of living without the toil, it is a real
>>>> disincentive to the toil needed to achieve.
>>>>
>>>> This is illustrated by Ronald Reagan's story of the Red Hen.  This was
>>>> demonstrated in human terms in the old Soviet Union during the 1930's
>>>>         
>> with
>>     
>>>> the event of history the Ukrainians call the "Holodomor (Ukrainian:
>>>> Голодомор)"  See some information about the results of government
>>>> compulsion:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ukrainiangenocide.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.infoukes.com/history/famine/
>>>>
>>>> Understand that Marxism or socialism has as central purpose to replace
>>>>         
>> the
>>     
>>>> human belief in God.  Remember Whittaker Chambers, a former Communists
>>>>         
>> Party
>>     
>>>> member who admonished, "The revolutionary heart of Marxism is a simple
>>>> conviction: It is necessary to change the world.  This conviction is the
>>>> "vision of man's mind displacing God as the creative intelligence of the
>>>> world. It is the vision of man's liberated mind, by the sole force of
>>>>         
>> its
>>     
>>>> rational intelligence, redirecting man's destiny and reorganizing man's
>>>>         
>> life
>>     
>>>> and the world."
>>>>
>>>> So you really think that you are smarter than all those who came before
>>>>         
>> you?
>>     
>>>> Ed K
>>>> Addendum:
>>>> Red Hen
>>>>
>>>> A modern day little red hen may not sound like or appear to be a
>>>>         
>> quotable
>>     
>>>> authority on economics but then some authorities aren't worth quoting.
>>>>
>>>> About a year ago I imposed a little poetry on you. It was called "The
>>>> Incredible Bread Machine" and made a lot of sense with reference to
>>>>         
>> matters
>>     
>>>> economic. You didn't object too much so having gotten away with it once
>>>>         
>> I'm
>>     
>>>> going to try again. This is a little treatise on basic economics called
>>>>         
>> "The
>>     
>>>> Modern little Red Hen."
>>>>
>>>> Once upon a time there was a little red hen who scratched about the
>>>>         
>> barnyard
>>     
>>>> until she uncovered some grains of wheat. She called her neighbors and
>>>>         
>> said
>>     
>>>> 'If we plant this wheat, we shall have bread to eat. Who will help me
>>>>         
>> plant
>>     
>>>> it?'
>>>>
>>>> "Not I, " said the cow.
>>>>
>>>> "Not I," said the duck.
>>>>
>>>> "Not I," said the pig.
>>>>
>>>> "Not I," said the goose.
>>>>
>>>> "Then I will," said the little red hen. And she did. The wheat grew tall
>>>>         
>> and
>>     
>>>> ripened into golden grain. "Who will help me reap my wheat?" asked the
>>>> little red hen.
>>>>
>>>> "Not I," said the duck.
>>>>
>>>> "Out of my classification," said the pig.
>>>>
>>>> "I'd lose my seniority," said the cow.
>>>>
>>>> "I'd lose my unemployment compensation," said the goose.
>>>>
>>>> "Then I will," said the little red hen, and she did.
>>>>
>>>> At last the time came to bake the bread. "Who will help me bake bread?"
>>>> asked the little red hen.
>>>>
>>>> "That would be overtime for me," said the cow.
>>>>
>>>> "I'd lose my welfare benefits," said the duck.
>>>>
>>>> "I'm a dropout and never learned how," said the pig.
>>>>
>>>> "If I'm to be the only helper, that's discrimination," said the goose.
>>>>
>>>> "Then I will," said the little red hen.
>>>>
>>>> She baked five loaves and held them up for the neighbors to see.
>>>>
>>>> They all wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share. But the little red
>>>>         
>> hen
>>     
>>>> said, "No, I can eat the five loaves myself."
>>>>
>>>> "Excess profits," cried the cow.
>>>>
>>>> "Capitalist leech," screamed the duck.
>>>>
>>>> "I demand equal rights," yelled the goose.
>>>>
>>>> And the pig just grunted.
>>>>
>>>> And they painted "unfair" picket signs and marched round and around the
>>>> little red hen shouting obscenities.
>>>>
>>>> When the government agent came, he said to the little red hen, "You must
>>>>         
>> not
>>     
>>>> be greedy."
>>>>
>>>> "But I earned the bread," said the little red hen.
>>>>
>>>> "Exactly," said the agent. "That's the wonderful free enterprise system.
>>>> Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our
>>>>         
>> modern
>>     
>>>> government regulations productive workers must divide their products
>>>>         
>> with
>>     
>>>> the idle."
>>>>
>>>> And they lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who
>>>>         
>> smiled
>>     
>>>> and clucked, "I am grateful, I am grateful." But her neighbors wondered
>>>>         
>> why
>>     
>>>> she never again baked any more bread.
>>>>
>>>> From Ronald Reagan...  Reagan In His Own Voice (Audio book/download) ^ |
>>>> November 1976 | Ronald Reagan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>       
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>     
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> Herb Parsons
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>     
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>   

-- 
Herb Parsons



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list