[Rhodes22-list] Political Re ply to Captain Ed

Brad Haslett flybrad at gmail.com
Mon Sep 1 19:08:14 EDT 2008


Nope.  The citizens don't own guns.

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Chris Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net> wrote:
> Thanks Brad,
>                    And though as you have said "Fairness" has a long way to
> go in China the whole atmosphere is rapidly changing. The collapse of the
> Soviet Union came as a surprise, anything like that on the horizon for
> China?
> Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Political Re ply to Captain Ed
>
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> You hit on an important point.  The problem with a one party system is
>> that even when you make the shift from a centrally planned economy to
>> capitalism, those with connections to the party hold the means to
>> production. That worked for awhile but the military and party owned
>> factories eventually had to compete with foreign goods and foreign
>> manufacturers that set-up shop in China. It didn't take long for
>> consumers to discover that a Shanghai Buick or Beijing Jeep was ten
>> times better than other domestic cars. It has taken twenty years to
>> happen, but to answer your question, yes, it's a level playing field
>> and it's highly competitive.  Many of the former army factories have
>> shut down because they couldn't compete domestically and they sure
>> couldn't compete in the export market. My sister-in-law (an accounting
>> professional with an MBA from Fordham) still advises against making
>> direct personal investments in Chinese companies because they're
>> behind on accounting issues.  Investing in Chinese companies listed on
>> the NYSE, like many of the airlines, is a different issue (note,
>> never, ever, ever invest in a passenger airline).  Based on the
>> Chinese experiment, the benefits of capitalism to the population are
>> immediate.  The "fairness" issues of the market take a couple of
>> decades or more to work out.  The former states of the Soviet Union
>> are following the same pattern with those states having competing
>> political parties making progress a little faster.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Chris Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net>
> wrote:
>> > Nice summation Brad, Just don't agree on the Rosey tinted glasses view.
> But
>> > you are right on about dumping communisim for a more free market.  Just
>> > curious I understand that the Army is making a go at factories and
>> > production of non military stuff.  How "free" are they to compete and
> and is
>> > it a level playing field.  Inquiring minds are curious.
>> >
>> > Chris G
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
>> > To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:12 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Political Re ply to Captain Ed
>> >
>> >
>> >> Chris,
>> >>
>> >> The economy - suffering from the real estate and mortgage silliness
>> >> but not a recession yet, exports saving the decline in GDP for now.
>> >>
>> >> War - Iraq winding down - the Iraqi's want us out (and we want out).
>> >> NATO petering out in Afghanistan (NATO petering out in Georgia), UN
>> >> non-existent, tough terrain, tough people, nuclear Pakistan.  Tough
>> >> situation 7 years later.  Radical Muslims still looking for a way to
>> >> kill us.  The war goes on.
>> >>
>> >> Taxes -  Tax revenue is up because of a cut in the capital gains tax
>> >> and increased investment in the economy.
>> >>
>> >> Between what rich and what poor are we talking about.  The World?  The
>> >> poor are gaining - did you watch the Olympics?  US economy?  We may be
>> >> the only nation on the planet where the poor owns a color TV,
>> >> air-conditioning, and two cars.  And, they are fat.
>> >>
>> >> And how would you like to focus on these issues, especially the
>> >> economic ones?  Trot out a few more failed economic theories or follow
>> >> China's path - ditch the Marxist bullshit and try a little old
>> >> fashioned capitalism?
>> >>
>> >> Brad
>> >>
>> >> On 8/31/08, Chris Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net> wrote:
>> >> > Thanks Tootle,
>> >> >                     We both agree that there are a lot of people who
>> > have
>> >> >  made mistakes and have gone on to lead better lives, so lets focus
> on
>> > the
>> >> >  actual issues, the economy, the war, taxes, the growing gap between
>> > rich and
>> >> >  poor.  These are where we need to focus.
>> >> >
>> >> >  Chris G
>> >> >  ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >  From: "Tootle" <ekroposki at charter.net>
>> >> >  To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>> >> >  Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 4:18 PM
>> >> >  Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Re ply to Captain Chris G.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Chris G said, "Boy I gotta agree, any of those cheating husbands
> and
>> >> >  > philanderers should be barred from making speeches at the
> convention.
>> > Of
>> >> >  > course that would include John McCain after what he did to his
> wife
>> > and
>> >> >  two
>> >> >  > kids after he came back. Got a new undamaged model with lots of
>> > money,
>> >> >  > prenup or not.  Does it matter?  Careful there are lots of glass
>> > houses.
>> >> >  > Should we bar those who have killed a person in a car accident
> that
>> > they
>> >> >  > caused?  Ok that keeps out Ted Kennedy, but also Laura Bush.
> Should
>> > we
>> >> >  bar
>> >> >  > someone who stole drugs (in one case from a non-profit set up to
> help
>> > war
>> >> >  > victims), and forged
>> >> >  > prescriptions well I guess that would shut up Mrs. McCain and Rush
>> >> >  Limbaugh.
>> >> >  > Tootle, help me out, to be fair and balanced I need a drug
> thieving
>> >> >  democrat
>> >> >  > to balance this out. Oh I know Marion Berry should do."
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Responses as follows:
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > As to John McCain - after how many years in a North Viet Nam
>> > prison? - He
>> >> >  > had adjustment problems when he came back.  How much time did you
>> > spend in
>> >> >  > the Hanoi Hilton?  He later realized he screwed up and admits it.
>> > Too
>> >> >  late,
>> >> >  > but after some time he came around and has since lead a better
> life,
>> > other
>> >> >  > wise he would not be where he is.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > As to Ted Kennedy, I have always believed that he was drunk.
>> > However, the
>> >> >  > lady was in the back seat was in the same state.  Alcohol
> consumption
>> > is
>> >> >  not
>> >> >  > a legal excuse for killing another or is it Ben C?
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > As to Laura Bush at 17, poor driving skills kill many teenagers.
> Is
>> > that
>> >> >  > not the reason that age group has the highest insurance rates?
> Are
>> > you
>> >> >  > telling us that your judgment and driving skills have not changed
>> > since
>> >> >  you
>> >> >  > were 17?
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > As to drug addition and subsequently forging prescriptions, the
>> > medication
>> >> >  > that Rush became addicted to was a problem that the drug company
> did
>> > not
>> >> >  > correctly monitor and once the problem was known, physicians
> failed
>> > to
>> >> >  > follow up for addition.  Initially the drug was proscribed
> correctly,
>> > but
>> >> >  > the prescribing doctor did not follow up making sure that no
> addition
>> >> >  > occurred.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Once you are addicted, you the person is no longer in control.
> Have
>> > you
>> >> >  > never dealt with alcoholics?  If not, never ever again, give a
>> > recovered
>> >> >  > alcoholic 100% trust.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > There is a big problem in America with prescription drugs.  Often
>> > doctors
>> >> >  > are getting kickbacks from the drug companies and so are more
> willing
>> > to
>> >> >  > prescribe feel good drugs when they should not.  Yes this is
> partly
>> > the
>> >> >  > patients fault for asking for such drugs, but again, once there is
>> >> >  addition.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > The points that you raised are fair to raise and be addressed but
>> > they are
>> >> >  > distinguishable from a lawyer, who as part of bar qualifying has
>> > specific
>> >> >  > ethics training from committing perjury.   I have said that his
>> >> >  philandering
>> >> >  > is one thing, but his committing perjury is a whole different
> matter.
>> > And
>> >> >  > as Ben C said he was suspended for five years for doing it.  The
>> > Arkansas
>> >> >  > Bar said even a former President needed his ____ slapped for doing
>> > it.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > So I have partially addressed your comments.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > Ed K
>> >> >  > Greenville, SC, USA
>> >> >  > attachment:
>> >> >  >
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19247108/Chris%2BG%2527s%2BReasoning.jpg
>> >> >  > Chris+G%27s+Reasoning.jpg
>> >> >  > --
>> >> >  > View this message in context:
>> >> >
>> > http://www.nabble.com/Reply-to-Captain-Chris-G.-tp19247108p19247108.html
>> >> >  > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >  >
>> >> >  > __________________________________________________
>> >> >  > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list
> go
>> > to
>> >> >  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> >> >  > __________________________________________________
>> >> >  >
>> >> >
>> >> >  __________________________________________________
>> >> >  To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
> to
>> > http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> >> >  __________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> > http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> > __________________________________________________
>> >
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list