[Rhodes22-list] therapeutic reply to Todd that the rest of ou can skip

[Rick]

Stan,

For those of us who are hero worshiping impaired, which George Bush was
that?

Rick

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:

> Dear Todd,
>
> In your e-mail of 1/20/10 you say, "don't bring me into this",  "don't put
> words in my mouth" and sign "straight shooter".   So I know you will allow
> me the sport, fun and right of follow up, checking how on or off target you
> may be:
>
> "don't bring me into this".   Too late  You already brought yourself into
> our holistic issues with your prior e-mails.
>
> In your e-mail of 12/29/09 you say I said that, "membership to this list be
> conditional upon agreement to giving GB a 5% commission".  I do not recall
> ever saying this.  If you can show me that quote I will apologize to the
> List.  If you cannot, I would expect your apology to the List for putting
> words in my mouth.
>
> In other e-mails inserting yourself in the fray, you posted that it is Art
> who is being (your words) "vilified and berated".  Come on straight shooter,
>  you know the fact is it is GB who is being harassed by Art not following
> the rule of law and breaking agreements and that it is GB who presented a
> proposal of resolution that, as far as I know, Art has ignored.   Until this
> matter is equitably resolved it will keep coming up.  And, until resolved,
> GB's response to calls of help from GB, will be per George Bush's, "You are
> either with us or against us" - we feel that betrayed.
>
> We will not bring you in (unless you ask) to any future give and take on
> the issues of GB's value to re-sales or the List's well being;.   We know
> that in your humble opinion the GB position is "insane" and that in GB's
> humble opinion GB's contributions to the demand and price level of re-sales
> and the List's growth and longevity, are priceless - that something like the
> 5% "loyalty/royalty" notion is a mad bargain.   Of course the fact that you
> and I are at the productive end of these 2 issues does not mean I will not
> enjoy further debate with anyone else who is still not clear on the
> arguments or even the analogies like the "Shakers", now that I am adopting
> my new hero's position on basic survival conflicts of  "Bring it on".
>
> stan/gbi
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>