[Rhodes22-list] Economics

Bill Effros bill at effros.com
Sun Mar 25 17:42:47 EDT 2007


1.  Real Estate is not a commodity.

2.  It can and has gone up forever.

Bill Effros

Brad Haslett wrote:
> Wally,
>
> You can't legislate away the business cycle.  It is foolish to think that
> any commodity can go up forever, real estate included. Too bad for those
> people who overextended themselves, including the bankers.  Let them all
> fall on their face and be done with it!   I've been telling everyone the
> economy was good for the last few years because it has been good for the
> last few years.  Not once did I ever say it would go on forever.  Our debt
> as a percentage of GNP is well manageable, including the cost of the war,
> but we can't keep spending on entitlement programs, especially social
> security with the coming baby boom retirements, and expect things to stay
> healthy. Look at where the money goes!  Our defense spending as a per cent
> of GNP ain't Jack Shit compared to entitlements.  Do the math at  on that
> before you go ballistic.  I don't wear rose colored glasses, I wear a green
> eyeshade (must be that accounting undergrad thing).  Anyone who thinks we
> can compete in the global market with our population growing more and more
> dependent on the federal government is hiding behind the roses or just
> doesn't understand basic macro-economics. The new economic front is India
> and China.  They are already looking over their shoulder at Vietnam.  This
> is a small globe and any prudent investor hedges his/her bets by putting
> some money in the places that are kicking our ass. I don't drink Kool-Aid
> when it comes to economics, I'm a realist and a history buff.  You should
> worry about government spending - every 'nanny' government in the last
> century has either failed or changed drastically (think Soviet Union and
> China in that order).  EuroIslamia is next.  We're probably on the leading
> edge of a correction (recession).  That's time to go shopping for bargains -
> things are about to go on sale.
>
> Wally, it would be damned difficult for me to do my career over again.  The
> government, in their efforts to save everyone from themselves has almost
> killed general aviation.  You can't hang around the airport fence as a
> teenager and beg for a job.  This development in my industry is pervasive
> through out our economy.  We're getting our asses kicked in growth rates as
> a result. Combine the heavy hand of the federal government with
> over-regulating everything and the propensity to over tax and we're the
> also-ran in the global marketplace. I know you don't like the war but what
> would we do with the money we saved?  Give it back to the taxpayers.  Hell
> no!  We'd find more 'victims' to spend it on.
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> On 3/25/07, TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Brad,
>>
>> Maybe the FEDEX financials have you seeing things differently..... but
>> based
>> on the dozens if not hundreds of links you post I would say you drink a
>> lot
>> of cool aid. You have been trying to tell all for years now how great the
>> economy is (was?) and we shouldn't worry about the cost of the war or the
>> growing debt....it is not a problem.....yeah..yeah...yeah.
>>
>> I must admit I am in total agreement about not having sympathy for people
>> who over extend due to keeping up with the Jone's. I also agree the
>> President is given to much credit or blame for the economy. Please note
>> that
>> I made zero reference to Bush in the discussion of housing bust.
>>
>> I can handle my own spending just fine but it is the government spending
>> that worries me more.
>>
>> Wally
>>
>>
>>     
>>> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Economics
>>> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:53:53 -0600
>>>
>>> Wally,
>>>
>>> Glad I was busy and on the road for this thread.  When it comes to
>>> economics, I don't drink anyone's Kool-Aid but look at the facts and make
>>> my
>>> own judgements.  Just as the Clinton year,s boom was based on the hype of
>>> the dot-coms (and unstainable), much of the Bush 43 boom was based on
>>> Detroit gas-guzzlers and cheap money (thus the real estate nonsense).
>>> Neither could last forever.  All Presidents take credit for good times
>>>       
>> and
>>     
>>> get blamed for bad ones when in fact, Presidents don't have that much
>>> influence on the market.  This is a good thing!  Bush did some smart
>>>       
>> things
>>     
>>> after 9/11, like cut taxes to spur the economy, and some really dumb
>>>       
>> ones,
>>     
>>> like bail out airlines that should have been allowed to go
>>>       
>> under.  Frankly,
>>     
>>> I have little sympathy for people getting burned for overbuying what they
>>> could afford in real estate just I have little sympathy for shareholders
>>> who
>>> got burned on Enron or WorldCom.  The market is what the market is and
>>> Presidents and the Congress usually muck-up necessary corrections when
>>>       
>> they
>>     
>>> meddle in the marketplace.  We've had a record number or quarters of good
>>> economic performance and only a fool would think that will last forever.
>>> The big question is wether the correction will entail a hard landing or a
>>> soft landing?
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> On 3/23/07, TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Ed, Reread my post.... no one blamed Bush....are you really that
>>>>         
>> dense?
>>     
>>> I
>>>       
>>>> said our economy was a house of cards.....no blame was even suggested.
>>>>         
>> A
>>     
>>>> little defensive? I did say Brad was discounting the potential problem
>>>> looming because he was drinking Bush's cool aid. Again Bush did not
>>>>         
>>> cause
>>>       
>>>> this. The lending crisis is not a government issue although it may be
>>>>         
>>> the
>>>       
>>>> government (us!) paying for this. Also Bush had no influence on
>>>>         
>> lending
>>     
>>>> guidelines or the problem. This is not a liberal or conservative
>>>>         
>> issue.
>>     
>>>> Wally
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> From: Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
>>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>>>>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Economics
>>>>> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wally:
>>>>>
>>>>>      What you have said is particularly true where house values are
>>>>> overvalued in anticipation of increasing in value.  I suspect a big
>>>>>           
>>> time
>>>       
>>>>> shake out coming.  However, you blame Bush.  Come on now, where were
>>>>>           
>>> the
>>>       
>>>>> Democratic critics a couple of years past.
>>>>>
>>>>>       Bush's stated intent was to allow anybody who really wanted a
>>>>>           
>>>> house
>>>>         
>>>>> to
>>>>> be able to get one.  His ecomomics have helped that goal.  Now it is
>>>>>           
>> up
>>     
>>>> to
>>>>         
>>>>> them to keep them.
>>>>>
>>>>>        Not all will.  However, I suspect many will.  The current
>>>>>           
>>> default
>>>       
>>>>> rate in the sub prime market is quoted as 23%.  Truth is it will go
>>>>>           
>> up
>>     
>>> in
>>>       
>>>> a
>>>>         
>>>>> recession.  Remember some of the creative sub par financiing was pure
>>>>> speculation.
>>>>>
>>>>>        There will be some creative ways to help prevent defaults,
>>>>>           
>> but
>>     
>>>> that
>>>>         
>>>>> does not answer your premise, why was the situation permitted.  It is
>>>>>           
>> a
>>     
>>>>> general governance issue and legislators of both parties did not want
>>>>>           
>>> to
>>>       
>>>>> say
>>>>> or do anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>        What is more interesting to look at is the declining value of
>>>>>           
>>> the
>>>       
>>>>> dollar.  They say inflation is under control.  However, what you get
>>>>>           
>>> for
>>>       
>>>>> the
>>>>> dollar is less.  So the value of some of those homes under duress is
>>>>>           
>>> not
>>>       
>>>>> the
>>>>> same value in dollars as a few years ago.  Hum.  Another way to hide
>>>>>           
>>>> facts.
>>>>         
>>>>>        This is not a Bush issue, but the way the politicians and
>>>>>           
>> press
>>     
>>>>> hide
>>>>> the truth.  If it were a liberal democrat in office, they would be
>>>>>           
>>>> looking
>>>>         
>>>>> elsewere, and so would you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed K
>>>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TN Rhodey wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Brad, You have been to be busy being a cheer leader for Bush to
>>>>>>             
>>> notice
>>>       
>>>>> our
>>>>>           
>>>>>> economy is unbalanced. I told you several months ago that the
>>>>>>             
>>> mortgage
>>>       
>>>>> and
>>>>>           
>>>>>> home industry was "a house of cards and heading for huge
>>>>>>             
>>> correction".
>>>       
>>>>> You
>>>>>           
>>>>>> responded and said your home values are fine in Memphis .....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The largest sub-prime lenders are in trouble and in the last 90
>>>>>>             
>> days
>>     
>>>>> some
>>>>>           
>>>>>> 30
>>>>>> mortgage banks have closed or pulled out of sub-prime lending. The
>>>>>>             
>>>> other
>>>>         
>>>>>> shoe will drop when all the folks with low Interest Only payments,
>>>>>>             
>>>>> balloon
>>>>>           
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> nds, or ARMs have to refinance and find they can not because they
>>>>>>             
>>> owe
>>>       
>>>>> more
>>>>>           
>>>>>> than the home is worth. They will be stuck with a rising payment
>>>>>>             
>>> they
>>>       
>>>>> can
>>>>>           
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> longer make. The common trend in home buying has been 100%
>>>>>>             
>>> financing.
>>>       
>>>> In
>>>>         
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> old days you needed to have 20% or so. Being upside down equity
>>>>>>             
>> wise
>>     
>>>> in
>>>>         
>>>>> a
>>>>>           
>>>>>> car is bad...evenworse when you are upside down in equity in you
>>>>>>             
>>>> rhome.
>>>>         
>>>>>> Many
>>>>>> folks are upside down in equity in their home and 2 car payments.
>>>>>>             
>>> Like
>>>       
>>>> i
>>>>         
>>>>>> said we are building anice house of cards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do a google search for "sub prime lending woes".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The leaders of companies like New Century maybe looking at jail
>>>>>>             
>>> time.
>>>       
>>>>> This
>>>>>           
>>>>>> is tied into our overall economy in more ways than most
>>>>>>             
>> understand.
>>     
>>>>>> Wally
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Economics
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:48:18 -0500
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hunker down boys and girls and protect your investments - the sky
>>>>>>>               
>>>> isn't
>>>>         
>>>>>>> falling but we're going to have a low ceiling for awhile.  Follow
>>>>>>>               
>>> any
>>>       
>>>>>>> benchmark you want but this is one of the best predictors out
>>>>>>>               
>> there.
>>     
>>>> The
>>>>         
>>>>>>> understatement is "automotive and housing", that is a huge chunk
>>>>>>>               
>> of
>>     
>>>> the
>>>>         
>>>>>>> economy and both are going through major corrections. Don't
>>>>>>>               
>> believe
>>     
>>>> that
>>>>         
>>>>>>> last sentence, it's boilerplate "the world would be safe if it
>>>>>>>               
>>> wasn't
>>>       
>>>>> for
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> those damn pilots" bullshit.  Brad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Slowing Economy Takes a Toll On FedEx's Quarterly Results
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FedEx Corp. reported Wednesday that its earnings dropped 1.9% in
>>>>>>>               
>> the
>>     
>>>>> fiscal
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> third quarter, stung by the slowing economy, lower fuel surcharges
>>>>>>>               
>>> and
>>>       
>>>>>>> severe winter weather.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The package-delivery company, which is seen as a bellwether for
>>>>>>>               
>> the
>>     
>>>>> overall
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> economy, also lowered its outlook for fiscal fourth-quarter
>>>>>>>               
>>> earnings,
>>>       
>>>>>>> tightening both ends of the forecast range by a nickel share.
>>>>>>>               
>> FedEx
>>     
>>>> also
>>>>         
>>>>>>> said that, while its long-term goal remains 10% to 15% annual
>>>>>>>               
>> growth
>>     
>>>> in
>>>>         
>>>>>>> earnings per share, growth during the coming fiscal year may fall
>>>>>>>               
>>>> short
>>>>         
>>>>>>> because of the sluggish economy and investments that FedEx expects
>>>>>>>               
>>> to
>>>       
>>>>> make
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> in its business.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The U.S. economy grew at a lower rate than we expected in the
>>>>>>>               
>> third
>>     
>>>>>>> quarter, and we saw continued adjustments in the automotive and
>>>>>>>               
>>>> housing
>>>>         
>>>>>>> markets," FedEx Chairman, President and Chief Executive Fred Smith
>>>>>>>               
>>>> said
>>>>         
>>>>> in
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> the press release. "I believe, however, this represents a healthy
>>>>>>> transition
>>>>>>> for the economy as it phases into a more sustainable growth rate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "FedEx is in excellent position to take full advantage of global
>>>>>>> economic-growth trends and deliver overall outstanding financial
>>>>>>>               
>>>> results
>>>>         
>>>>> in
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> the long run," Mr. Smith said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Memphis, Tenn., company earned $420 million, or $1.35 a share,
>>>>>>>               
>>> in
>>>       
>>>>> the
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> quarter ended Feb. 28, compared with $428 million, or $1.38 a
>>>>>>>               
>> share,
>>     
>>> a
>>>       
>>>>> year
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> earlier. Revenue rose 7% to $8.59 billion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The results, which marked the first profit decline for the
>>>>>>>               
>> delivery
>>     
>>>>> giant
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> more than three years, were at the high end of the $1.20 to $1.35
>>>>>>>               
>> a
>>     
>>>>> share
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> forecast range the company set in December, when it reported
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> second-quarter
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> results. Earnings topped analysts' forecasts, while revenue missed
>>>>>>> expectations. Analysts polled by Thomson Financial expected, on
>>>>>>>               
>>>> average,
>>>>         
>>>>>>> earnings of $410.1 million, or $1.33 a share, on revenue of $8.7
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> billion.
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> FedEx previously said the typical surge in holiday-related freight
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> volumes
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> was "a bit delayed," the latest sign that a slowdown starting in
>>>>>>>               
>> the
>>     
>>>>> summer
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> and fall at many railroads and trucking companies may be spreading
>>>>>>>               
>>> to
>>>       
>>>>>>> package carriers that handle many shipments on the last leg of
>>>>>>>               
>> their
>>     
>>>>>>> journey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FedEx's average daily package volume in its express and ground
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> businesses
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> rose 4% in the latest quarter, compared with the year-earlier
>>>>>>>               
>>> period,
>>>       
>>>>>>> helped
>>>>>>> by growth in international express.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Revenue in the express business rose 3% to $5.52 billion, and
>>>>>>>               
>>> revenue
>>>       
>>>> in
>>>>         
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> ground business increased 12% to $1.52 billion. FedEx's freight
>>>>>>>               
>>>> revenue
>>>>         
>>>>>>> rose
>>>>>>> 30% to $1.1 billion. The Kinko's retail-shipping and office-supply
>>>>>>> business,
>>>>>>> however, continued struggling, with revenue declining 3% to $485
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> million.
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> FedEx expects to earn between $1.93 and $2.08 a share during the
>>>>>>>               
>>>> current
>>>>         
>>>>>>> quarter. Its prior guidance had been $1.98 to $2.13 a share.
>>>>>>>               
>>> Analysts
>>>       
>>>>>>> polled
>>>>>>> by Thomson Financial expect, on average, for the company to earn
>>>>>>>               
>>> $2.03
>>>       
>>>> a
>>>>         
>>>>>>> share during the quarter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excluding second-quarter costs associated with the new pilot labor
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> contract
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> at the FedEx Express segment, the company expects to earn between
>>>>>>>               
>>>> $6.70
>>>>         
>>>>> and
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> $6.85 a share for the year. Its prior guidance had been $6.60 to
>>>>>>>               
>>> $6.90
>>>       
>>>> a
>>>>         
>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Wall Street Journal*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *3/21/2007*
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> 5.5%* 30 year fixed mortgage rate. Good credit refinance. Up to 5
>>>>>>             
>>> free
>>>       
>>>>>> quotes - *Terms
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>> https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2a5d&s=4056&p=5117&disc=y&vers=910
>>     
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Economics-tf3447654.html#a9634414
>>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>           
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Live Search Maps � find all the local information you need, right when
>>>>         
>>> you
>>>       
>>>> need it. http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag2&FORM=MGAC01
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>       
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon.
>>
>> http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglinemarch07
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>     
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>   


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list