[Rhodes22-list] (politics) See with a little work we can reach common ground

Herb Parsons hparsons at parsonsys.com
Mon Jun 23 10:35:58 EDT 2008


Brad,

I'm beginning to worry about you. You keep muddying up this "discussion" 
with facts. Shame on you.

Brad Haslett wrote:
> Rob,
>
> If by "they" you mean al Qaeda you are correct.  We made some serious
> mistakes after the fall of Bahgdad, including disbanding the Iraqi army and
> not keeping Sunni civil servants in power.  The Sunni's never gave up hope
> of being restored to the ruling party, didn't participate in the first round
> of elections, and sided with the al Qaeda (with logistal support from Iran)
> to fight the US occupation force.  Once the Iraqi's decided that al Qaeda
> had raped one too many 12 year old boys and 13 year old girls, both sides of
> the "civil war" sided with the US and now al Qaeda is on the ropes and even
> by their own admission, they can't recruit new "freedom fighters" for Iraq.
> The Maliki government has met or is meeting most of the political mileposts
> set by the Democrats in Congress (not that you read about it in the press).
> Will they return to a civil war after we leave?  Know one knows for sure but
> it would be inhumane to wish for that just in the interest of scoring cheap
> political points.
>
> If you are so precient that you know what tomorrow will bring, can you spare
> some time for me to go over some of my investments?
>
> Brad
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Lowe, Rob <rlowe at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>   
>> Well, let's see.  We invaded their country and they'll trying to kill
>> our soldiers.  Seems pretty obvious.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Herb Parsons
>> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 10:47 PM
>> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>  Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] (politics) See with a little work we can
>> reach common ground
>>
>> Rob, where are you getting your information that "they do not want us
>> there"?
>>
>> Rob Lowe wrote:
>>     
>>> Now THAT's history written like you won't find in the books.  Thanks,
>>>       
>> John,
>>     
>>> for a refreshing look at it.  That's pretty much the way I understand
>>>       
>> and
>>     
>>> remember it too.  Yes, the Vietnamese and Chinese are long time
>>>       
>> adversaries
>>     
>>> and they did fight a border war after we withdrew.  Vietnam was
>>>       
>> another war
>>     
>>> where flawed policy and beliefs led to a war we could not win.  Uncle
>>>       
>> Ho
>>     
>>> wanted the invaders out of the country, be it the French, the
>>>       
>> Americans, or
>>     
>>> the Chinese.  An invader can not win a long term war against a
>>>       
>> determined
>>     
>>> foe that wants them out of there.  The examples are many.  All the
>>>       
>> colonial
>>     
>>> powers have withdrawn from their former colonies (anyone remember the
>>> Colonies vs. England?).  That's why McCain's plans for Iraq are
>>>       
>> doomed.
>>     
>>> I'll say it again, we can not and will not win in Iraq over the long
>>>       
>> haul.
>>     
>>> We invaded their country and they do not want us there.  They are
>>>       
>> tolerating
>>     
>>> us for now (like they have a choice, we do rule the country).  I'm
>>>       
>> very
>>     
>>> curious to see what happens when the UN mandate expires at the end of
>>>       
>> the
>>     
>>> year.  After that, the US will have no legal authority to remain in
>>>       
>> the
>>     
>>> country.  If the current talks between the administration and the
>>>       
>> Iraqi
>>     
>>> government do not result in an agreement (which sounds very iffy at
>>>       
>> the
>>     
>>> moment), then the next president won't have to worry about pulling out
>>>       
>> or
>>     
>>> not, we'll have to.  Unless the administration intends to ignore the
>>>       
>> rest of
>>     
>>> the worlds opinion.  Of wait, already done that.
>>>
>>> Speaking of beer, off to the bar!  Time to stop thinking and start
>>> drinking! - rob
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Shulick" <jsbudda at verizon.net>
>>> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] See with a little work we can reach
>>>       
>> common
>>     
>>> ground
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Brad,
>>>>
>>>>      I like beer too !
>>>>
>>>> As for the rest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Neither of these guys are the 'sharpest knives in the drawer'.  If
>>>>         
>> McCain
>>     
>>>> had a clue he would have explained to his torturers, "look guys, life
>>>>         
>> for
>>     
>>>> your friends the Chinese really sucks right now.  They've shut down
>>>>         
>> all
>>     
>>> the
>>>
>>>       
>>>> universities and smart kids your age are out in rice paddies picking
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> leeches
>>>
>>>       
>>>> off their legs.  Eventually the Chinese will quit this silly nonsense
>>>>         
>> and
>>     
>>>> start building toasters for WalMart and you guys will be stuck making
>>>> underwear.  In the meantime, Uncle Ho and his buddies will kill 3
>>>>         
>> million
>>     
>>> of
>>>
>>>       
>>>> your countrymen and another million will head to sea and eventually
>>>>         
>> in up
>>     
>>> in
>>>
>>>       
>>>> the US and buy of hotels and convenience stores and stuff. I
>>>>         
>> apologize for
>>     
>>>> President Truman ignoring Uncle Ho's request for assistance back in
>>>>         
>> the
>>     
>>> late
>>>
>>>       
>>>> 40's, but the French needed their asses pulled out of the fire again
>>>>         
>> (I
>>     
>>>> know, you'd think saving them from the Nazi's would have been enough
>>>>         
>> but
>>     
>>>> then we had to save them from the Communists). Why don't you guys put
>>>>         
>> down
>>     
>>>> the sticks and let me explain a little capitalism and econ101 to
>>>>         
>> you".
>>     
>>>> Unless my knowledge is faulty I believe the backer of the North
>>>>         
>> Vietnamese
>>     
>>>> was the old Soviet Union and not the Chinese who were busy carrying
>>>>         
>> out
>>     
>>>> there "cultural revolution" of Mao and trying to produce iron in
>>>>         
>> peasants
>>     
>>>> backyards. We ignored Ho's requests because french plantation owners'
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> didn't
>>>
>>>       
>>>> want to lose access to their slave labor force and we were backing
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> DeGaulle
>>>
>>>       
>>>> and any petty thug or warlord that promised to fight the Red Menace
>>>> (remember the Shaw of Iran and his secret police). After we left
>>>>         
>> China and
>>     
>>>> Nam fought a conventional boarder war around 1980 (not totally sure
>>>>         
>> of the
>>     
>>>> date sorry) which Nam won or now it would be a Chinese provence.
>>>>
>>>> That assumes of course that McCain understands economics himself
>>>>         
>> which by
>>     
>>>> his own admission, isn't his strong suit. That said, I'll take
>>>>         
>> someone
>>     
>>> with
>>>
>>>       
>>>> a weak foundation in capitalism over someone who understands Marxist
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> theory
>>>
>>>       
>>>> all too well.
>>>>
>>>> I am terrified with the thought of a POTUS with a weak foundation of
>>>> capitalism. The U.S. had pretty much unrestrained capitalism from its
>>>> formation to 1932 and what was the result? 60 hr work weeks,
>>>> sweatshops, sharecropping, child labor, no safety standards, the
>>>>         
>> company
>>     
>>>> store. Unrestrained capitalism is why I now have federal mine
>>>>         
>> subsidence
>>     
>>>> insurance the superfund to clean up toxic waste dumps and its my
>>>>         
>> money
>>     
>>> that
>>>
>>>       
>>>> is paying for this while the offspring of the Slimeballs who did this
>>>>         
>> live
>>     
>>>> in the Hamptons and vacation in the Bahamas.  I never met either of
>>>>         
>> my
>>     
>>>> grandfathers. both died in their 40s' form overwork in the mills that
>>>>         
>> made
>>     
>>>> the money to build Carnegie Hall. But I did see the medallion that
>>>>         
>> one of
>>     
>>>> them left behind that was given to him for 30 years of service,
>>>>         
>> stamped
>>     
>>> out
>>>
>>>       
>>>> of stainless steel they were to cheap to use silver. My grandmother
>>>>         
>> told
>>     
>>> me
>>>
>>>       
>>>> when she was young she remembers company goons kicking the door in on
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> random
>>>
>>>       
>>>> searches the company carried out to make sure no employees were
>>>>         
>> stealing.
>>     
>>> 4
>>>
>>>       
>>>> generations of people in the Pgh. area busted their butts and fought
>>>>         
>> in 2
>>     
>>>> world wars to create the capital that then turned its back to the
>>>>         
>> city and
>>     
>>>> found fresh slaves in Mexico and China. I'll take my chance on the
>>>> Obamination as you would call him because I've seen the results of
>>>> capitalism and unless you happen to be fortunate enough to be born
>>>>         
>> into
>>     
>>> the
>>>
>>>       
>>>> upper classes you're pretty much screwed. Please don't bother to
>>>>         
>> reply
>>     
>>> with
>>>
>>>       
>>>> any rags to riches bullshit stories, for every one cited  I could
>>>>         
>> recite
>>     
>>>> 1000 others who worked just as hard and got nowhere for their
>>>>         
>> efforts.
>>     
>>> There
>>>
>>>       
>>>> was a man named Hall who worked for Westinghouse in the late 50's or
>>>>         
>> early
>>     
>>>> 60's who invented the process for making artificial diamonds, for his
>>>> discovery the company in is overwhelming gratitude awarded him a $25
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> savings
>>>
>>>       
>>>> bond. Wonder how much they made on that since then?
>>>>
>>>> But I do like beer especially Pa. beer (I buy local and don't shop at
>>>> Chink-mart either)
>>>>
>>>> Keep em coming
>>>> John Shulick
>>>>
>>>>          "Resistance is futile you will be assimilated" The Borg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>>>>         
>> http://www.nabble.com/The-Post-Turtle-%28Humor-Political%29-tp17936590p1
>> 7991499.html
>>     
>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>         
>> to
>>     
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>       
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>       
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>     
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>     
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
>   



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list